Why are children being denied their fathers? Why do we think that every divorced man deserves everything he's punished with and that every divorced woman is a victim? Why do we have no-fault divorce when men are forced, by law, to pay nearly 40% of their income in child-support? Why are children being used for state-sponsored extortion? Do these ideas sound radical? Review the facts. Unfortunately, these statements are sadly accurate.
Monday, November 14, 2016
Wednesday, May 25, 2016
Why We are ALL Screwed
The old folks just don't get it. They just don't get it. And the very young are clueless. They are all on Match.com saying they want something different. Ladies. Please. You kind of sicken me. Why? Because you all say you want something different, AND THEN YOU PICK THE SAME. GODDAMN. THING.
There are two secrets that are the worst kept secrets in the world ladies - WHAT INVESTMENT OR BUSINESS IS MAKING MONEY AND WHAT DOES ONE DO OR SAY TO SLEEP WITH A GIRL. Its all men talk about, sometimes compete over. And no matter what you say ladies, all that matters is WHAT. YOU. DO. And you are as predictable as the sun rising. You choose the alpha male and the alpha male starts out by mistreating you a little or else being funny and then aloof and distant, basically just humoring himself a little while in your presence.
Then he sits back and waits for you to get in line with the other girls AND YOU DO. YOU. ALL. DO. No one and I mean NO ONE is telling women to look for a stable nice guy, they are all letting women run after alphas or pseudo alphas WHO KNOW THAT MISTREATING WOMEN WORKS LIKE A CHARM, and women follow their instincts, run after the alpha, get used for sex and then run to the gov't with a baby in hand and demand change.
THE ONLY PERSON WHO CAN FIX THIS LADIES, IS YOU! THE GOVERNMENT CAN DO NOTHING! In fact the gov't has done a ton and what has happened!?!?! THINGS HAVE GOTTEN WORSE! Women go after even MORE dominant alphas in an even desperate way and men get even MORE distant and abusive as they see women are not saving themselves for marriage but are instead letting themselves be used for sex!
EVERYONE JUST STOP. RIGHT NOW. This. cannot. continue. There is a great person out there for you. They are not a pushover, but they do want to please you. And you want to please them. So be nice to each other, show up on time, reply to e-mails, and don't play games. Its just that simple. And ladies, remind yourselves that men ARE SUPPOSED TO CHASE YOU, NOT THE OTHER WAY AROUND, YOU BLOODY IDIOTS. Ever watch a move from 1950? Even the charming handsome men ran after women, bought them things, said things to them, opened doors and pulled out chairs. Now the word is out - NEVER DO THAT - or else you're not an alpha!
There are girls out there with a child or more out of wedlock (from a man that used them for sex) and they are online posting ads saying, literally, I WANT AN ALPHA MALE.
YOU ARE TOO STUPID TO EXIST, I SWEAR. How many does it take? Will you be used 10 times by 10 different guys!?!?!? Jesus Christ. Do you even wonder what is going on!?!?! Do you even care? Does your brain work!?!?!
I saw an epic rant by one girl the other day in which she said exactly this and went on to state "WHY IS EVERYONE PLAYING GAMES AND ACTING LIKE THEY HAVE SOMETHING BETTER ON THE SIDE; THIS IS BULLSHIT, ITS GAME PLAYING AND ITS PATHETIC AND UNNECESSARY. STOP IT. "
I practically busted a rib from laughing. Look people, YOU ARE ALL FLAWED. You are ALL SCARED. You are humans. So quit acting so fucking tough. The tougher you act, the more afraid you are. So forget it. You're replaceable IF YOU PLAY GAMES. And playing games isn't necessarily dating two people at once; its a myriad of crap. Not replying in a timely fashion - people, you have cell phones with email and text. Don't fucking tell me you're too busy to reply for THREE DAYS when the reply is merely "Yes to Thursday." Or the game can be doubting the other person over and over again, and then when they give up and just want you to stop doubting and say fine, you're right, you blow up at them, accuse them of being disingenuous the whole time and leave in a fury. Or its being really open with them and honest, but when they are the same back, you recoil at their "weakness" and think them a beta male and run off to someone who barely gives you the time of day. Or you hold back and hold back and hold back but demand the other person bare their soul. You deserve all that you get, people. This shit is childish and it needs to stop. Be playful and funny if you want, but after that you better be sincere. Sarcasm is cute, but its goddamn dangerous and you better let it go.
What do adults do? They meet, shake hands, and introduce themselves. I'm told many of the girls online are waiting THREE WEEKS just to give their name! hahaha. That is in-sane! How scared and alone are these girls? Ladies, I would not REMEMBER you after 3 weeks. After 3 weeks I know I'm simply not important to you and therefore you are not important to me; no offense, but what do you expect? I once quasi-dated an AMAZING woman, who thought she was no big deal (she was short and flawed, sure, but she was gorgeous and amazing, at least to me) and this girl felt so small, she did nothing but talk herself up all the time. She was IMPOSSIBLE to impress and she built herself up to the point where she literally turned the real her into a kind of let down. So between feeling let down when seeing her and knowing she was impossible to impress, MAN AFTER MAN would leave her or ignore her. This girl WAS A BLOODY MODEL - she was THAT gorgeous, the prettiest girl I've ever seen. In the top 1% of attractiveness. But no man would date her for long because THEY JUST COULDN'T STAND THE GAMES she played and they all finally considered her to be as small as she thought herself to be, so they gave up and moved on. And this girl's response? BLAME THE MEN.
Do you hear me ladies? It does not matter HOW SEXY you are if you play games! They will backfire and BLOW UP IN YOUR FACE.
Do not trust ONE girl, NOT ONE who is pretty and has prospects among men, but whines because she is alone and there are no good men out there. IT IS A TOTAL CROCK OF SHIT. She plays games trying to look extra red hot to the men and they hate her game playing shit; so the only ones that play along are ALSO playing games and they're seasoned pros who really hate women; these are players - the guys who hurt her and then never return her calls. She CHOSE that guy, and ignored the good ones who were honest and polite and candid. Pity her? I pity the choices SHE OPENLY MAKES. That is all.
I give up.
There are two secrets that are the worst kept secrets in the world ladies - WHAT INVESTMENT OR BUSINESS IS MAKING MONEY AND WHAT DOES ONE DO OR SAY TO SLEEP WITH A GIRL. Its all men talk about, sometimes compete over. And no matter what you say ladies, all that matters is WHAT. YOU. DO. And you are as predictable as the sun rising. You choose the alpha male and the alpha male starts out by mistreating you a little or else being funny and then aloof and distant, basically just humoring himself a little while in your presence.
Then he sits back and waits for you to get in line with the other girls AND YOU DO. YOU. ALL. DO. No one and I mean NO ONE is telling women to look for a stable nice guy, they are all letting women run after alphas or pseudo alphas WHO KNOW THAT MISTREATING WOMEN WORKS LIKE A CHARM, and women follow their instincts, run after the alpha, get used for sex and then run to the gov't with a baby in hand and demand change.
THE ONLY PERSON WHO CAN FIX THIS LADIES, IS YOU! THE GOVERNMENT CAN DO NOTHING! In fact the gov't has done a ton and what has happened!?!?! THINGS HAVE GOTTEN WORSE! Women go after even MORE dominant alphas in an even desperate way and men get even MORE distant and abusive as they see women are not saving themselves for marriage but are instead letting themselves be used for sex!
EVERYONE JUST STOP. RIGHT NOW. This. cannot. continue. There is a great person out there for you. They are not a pushover, but they do want to please you. And you want to please them. So be nice to each other, show up on time, reply to e-mails, and don't play games. Its just that simple. And ladies, remind yourselves that men ARE SUPPOSED TO CHASE YOU, NOT THE OTHER WAY AROUND, YOU BLOODY IDIOTS. Ever watch a move from 1950? Even the charming handsome men ran after women, bought them things, said things to them, opened doors and pulled out chairs. Now the word is out - NEVER DO THAT - or else you're not an alpha!
There are girls out there with a child or more out of wedlock (from a man that used them for sex) and they are online posting ads saying, literally, I WANT AN ALPHA MALE.
YOU ARE TOO STUPID TO EXIST, I SWEAR. How many does it take? Will you be used 10 times by 10 different guys!?!?!? Jesus Christ. Do you even wonder what is going on!?!?! Do you even care? Does your brain work!?!?!
I saw an epic rant by one girl the other day in which she said exactly this and went on to state "WHY IS EVERYONE PLAYING GAMES AND ACTING LIKE THEY HAVE SOMETHING BETTER ON THE SIDE; THIS IS BULLSHIT, ITS GAME PLAYING AND ITS PATHETIC AND UNNECESSARY. STOP IT. "
I practically busted a rib from laughing. Look people, YOU ARE ALL FLAWED. You are ALL SCARED. You are humans. So quit acting so fucking tough. The tougher you act, the more afraid you are. So forget it. You're replaceable IF YOU PLAY GAMES. And playing games isn't necessarily dating two people at once; its a myriad of crap. Not replying in a timely fashion - people, you have cell phones with email and text. Don't fucking tell me you're too busy to reply for THREE DAYS when the reply is merely "Yes to Thursday." Or the game can be doubting the other person over and over again, and then when they give up and just want you to stop doubting and say fine, you're right, you blow up at them, accuse them of being disingenuous the whole time and leave in a fury. Or its being really open with them and honest, but when they are the same back, you recoil at their "weakness" and think them a beta male and run off to someone who barely gives you the time of day. Or you hold back and hold back and hold back but demand the other person bare their soul. You deserve all that you get, people. This shit is childish and it needs to stop. Be playful and funny if you want, but after that you better be sincere. Sarcasm is cute, but its goddamn dangerous and you better let it go.
What do adults do? They meet, shake hands, and introduce themselves. I'm told many of the girls online are waiting THREE WEEKS just to give their name! hahaha. That is in-sane! How scared and alone are these girls? Ladies, I would not REMEMBER you after 3 weeks. After 3 weeks I know I'm simply not important to you and therefore you are not important to me; no offense, but what do you expect? I once quasi-dated an AMAZING woman, who thought she was no big deal (she was short and flawed, sure, but she was gorgeous and amazing, at least to me) and this girl felt so small, she did nothing but talk herself up all the time. She was IMPOSSIBLE to impress and she built herself up to the point where she literally turned the real her into a kind of let down. So between feeling let down when seeing her and knowing she was impossible to impress, MAN AFTER MAN would leave her or ignore her. This girl WAS A BLOODY MODEL - she was THAT gorgeous, the prettiest girl I've ever seen. In the top 1% of attractiveness. But no man would date her for long because THEY JUST COULDN'T STAND THE GAMES she played and they all finally considered her to be as small as she thought herself to be, so they gave up and moved on. And this girl's response? BLAME THE MEN.
Do you hear me ladies? It does not matter HOW SEXY you are if you play games! They will backfire and BLOW UP IN YOUR FACE.
Do not trust ONE girl, NOT ONE who is pretty and has prospects among men, but whines because she is alone and there are no good men out there. IT IS A TOTAL CROCK OF SHIT. She plays games trying to look extra red hot to the men and they hate her game playing shit; so the only ones that play along are ALSO playing games and they're seasoned pros who really hate women; these are players - the guys who hurt her and then never return her calls. She CHOSE that guy, and ignored the good ones who were honest and polite and candid. Pity her? I pity the choices SHE OPENLY MAKES. That is all.
I give up.
Monday, April 25, 2016
Good Morning Honey. Welcome to Hell
When women have far more resources than men and men have nothing to offer.
You get this:
http://thoughtcatalog.com/melissa-moeller/2016/04/why-modern-dating-makes-me-want-to-punch-myself-in-the-throat/
Enjoy Hell.
-JB
You get this:
http://thoughtcatalog.com/melissa-moeller/2016/04/why-modern-dating-makes-me-want-to-punch-myself-in-the-throat/
Enjoy Hell.
-JB
Friday, April 22, 2016
Tuesday, April 19, 2016
What all Anti-Feminists are Missing
Great points in the video below, but he, like all men, are missing just ONE. KEY. ITEM. The community. These other cultures provide much more community. Their family structure is stronger, they have less (OR NO) liberal Holllywood influence in their lives, and the women are, generally, married once and only once, have many children, and enjoy a great deal of stability. They have a much lower rate of mental illness, alcoholism, divorce, suicide, etc.. Now understand, some of the cultures in the east are simply ignorant in some of their beliefs about women and think something like genitalia mutilation is a good thing. That said, in other areas, these places are simply kicking. our. ass. Prostitution doesn't exist (except for royalty or 7 figure bankers) in the general public, pornography is generally unavailable to the public, divorce is all but impossible for most, abortion is banned - these are GOOD things, not BAD things and they make for a stable environment for many (not all) women.
We have the best gift any country ever received - Freedom. And with it, we are throwing too many lives away. Corruption, pornography, polygamy in essence, the destruction of the nuclear family, children out of wedlock, STDs, drugs - they are all getting worse. They are going from fringe problems to becoming mainstream. Cultures in the East are as horrified at that as we are with some of their dysfunctional issues. The author below misses this.
We have the best gift any country ever received - Freedom. And with it, we are throwing too many lives away. Corruption, pornography, polygamy in essence, the destruction of the nuclear family, children out of wedlock, STDs, drugs - they are all getting worse. They are going from fringe problems to becoming mainstream. Cultures in the East are as horrified at that as we are with some of their dysfunctional issues. The author below misses this.
Friday, April 08, 2016
We Only Fund Hatred
The Nazis would be so. very. proud.
Modern Feminism - the ultimate hate movement.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/men/thinking-man/the-red-pill-the-movie-about-men-that-feminists-didnt-want-you-t/
Modern Feminism - the ultimate hate movement.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/men/thinking-man/the-red-pill-the-movie-about-men-that-feminists-didnt-want-you-t/
Monday, March 14, 2016
Young, Pretty, Educated and.....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JowiDnuBTHU
TOTALLY WRONG.
Here is another brainwashed fool. She advocates for a matriarchy - a female dominated culture. Those have been tried and have all failed.
ALL OF THEM.
Further, we don't have a real MALE-dominated culture. We have a culture dominated by LIBERAL MALES. Women don't even fully understand what it is they are rebelling against (doesn't help your credibility ladies). Corrupt, paid-for politicians. Non-earning fathers and husbands. Men who have slept around from a young age (with all-too willing, stupid, young girls). Men who "see nothing wrong" with premarital sex (means more STDs), no-fault divorce, easy-access abortion (lesser reason to avoid premarital sex), women voting (it results in a massive welfare state and high taxes), the sort of economic policies that minimize men's earnings and require a two-income family (women love to work until they have children, then its a burden), and basically support any of the crap out of Hollywood.
Women have been DUPED into this liberal-dominated society, and then they wake up after their 5th sexual partner, with no boyfriend, with their looks diminishing, and they want change. They want more political power. They want laws that FORCE and GOVERN even your legal behavior. Laws against possession, against ownership, setting prices, etc.. When you lose control you seek a tighter grasp and this just hastens your spiral into zero control and total blowup. Don't believe me? Talk to someone from a former communist culture. When there were virtually NO rules, NO state interference in marriage, the marriage rate was 95%. The divorce rate was a rounding error. A woman could step out of the front door and hit half a dozen conservative, married men with a rock. Now women are pissed at what they've helped to create (except for very young women who are totally and utterly clueless). I don't blame them. The world is now set up to USE them for short-term financial gains and sex. AND THAT IS ALL.
Their solution? Total female control. The result of that? The final collapse.
TOTALLY WRONG.
Here is another brainwashed fool. She advocates for a matriarchy - a female dominated culture. Those have been tried and have all failed.
ALL OF THEM.
Further, we don't have a real MALE-dominated culture. We have a culture dominated by LIBERAL MALES. Women don't even fully understand what it is they are rebelling against (doesn't help your credibility ladies). Corrupt, paid-for politicians. Non-earning fathers and husbands. Men who have slept around from a young age (with all-too willing, stupid, young girls). Men who "see nothing wrong" with premarital sex (means more STDs), no-fault divorce, easy-access abortion (lesser reason to avoid premarital sex), women voting (it results in a massive welfare state and high taxes), the sort of economic policies that minimize men's earnings and require a two-income family (women love to work until they have children, then its a burden), and basically support any of the crap out of Hollywood.
Women have been DUPED into this liberal-dominated society, and then they wake up after their 5th sexual partner, with no boyfriend, with their looks diminishing, and they want change. They want more political power. They want laws that FORCE and GOVERN even your legal behavior. Laws against possession, against ownership, setting prices, etc.. When you lose control you seek a tighter grasp and this just hastens your spiral into zero control and total blowup. Don't believe me? Talk to someone from a former communist culture. When there were virtually NO rules, NO state interference in marriage, the marriage rate was 95%. The divorce rate was a rounding error. A woman could step out of the front door and hit half a dozen conservative, married men with a rock. Now women are pissed at what they've helped to create (except for very young women who are totally and utterly clueless). I don't blame them. The world is now set up to USE them for short-term financial gains and sex. AND THAT IS ALL.
Their solution? Total female control. The result of that? The final collapse.
The Reason Why You Are Not Married, Ladies
You're not marriage material.
Period. The End.
Don't be mad at me, I did not make you this way. Now. Let's be reasonable. THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH YOU, by and large. You are probably reasonably attractive (to someone, so throw that fashion-rag away), and you're not the world's most twisted and corrupt person, so you are a woman some man will consider marrying.
But no man is considering marrying you. Possibly not even your boyfriend. Seriously. Not even him.
Why?
You're not marriage material. If you were, you would be married.
You're too distrustful. Closed. A bit bitter. You play games. You feel justified in doing so because you're last 2 "boyfriends" (men who were loosely dating you, but not really interested) left you. You try to gain the upper hand in the relationship when your partner doesn't give a shit about upper hands and is trying to be a respected equal or even a superior who provides for you. You dodge personal questions. You slept with too many men. You wasted your innocence on a few jocks or tall, handsome Lotharios that a dozen other girls were after, and now you drink too much and share a whole lot less. You plot to trap a man into something long-term whilst staying defensive about anything long-term. You want someone to care deeply for you, but you won't allow yourself to care deeply for anyone else.
In short, you're emotionally broken. There is nothing wrong with you otherwise. In fact you may very well be a very loving, caring, generous person, and probably are. The sort of person who loves to volunteer and see children smile. But you royally screwed up your personal life because you listened to Hollywood and your own run-after-the-alpha-male instinct. If your parents gave you any personal advice, you ignored them and dismissed them as being old-fashioned and out-of-touch with what it takes to get a dominant man.
And now you're left with a big bag of broken heart and zero faith. The beta-males have now aged and become as emotionally intelligent as you, a day you thought would never come. They can smell this about you; the distrust. The fear. The cunning and waiting manipulation. The permanent loss of faith.
On top of everything lies the fact that in the case of divorce (which you are but a stone's throw away from), you get everything and your ex-husband is treated like a slave, quite literally. So you are, in essence, a landmine. If a man does not step carefully he is blown apart by you, especially financially. So your emotional stability - or lack thereof - is absolutely everything to a man, and you have not been taking care of yours.
Your moral integrity is as important as your reproductive integrity. Anyone telling you anything different IS LYING TO YOU (usually in order to extract money from you for fashion items or else for a cause - cough, feminism, cough).
Listen up: we want no part of it. None. We've seen two dozen girls like you and we know how this ends. With us getting tired of waiting for you to "come around," emotionally and mentally, and be vulnerable with us, or else we're convinced even when moving forward with you one of your hands has a divorce lawyer on speed dial. All while we question your ability to endure in a marriage. We know you hold ALL men in low esteem due to the actions of a few and we remember being passed over by the younger and prettier version of you cruising the jocks who everyone knew were only after sex (yes, the men are bitter too).
On the list of accomplishments of any decent man is "the love of a good woman." If you've thrown away your emotional integrity, you are not one of those.
In short, you've wasted far too much of what you had to offer and much of that is due to the environment you are living in; but ultimately you are responsible for what has happened to you, and if you don't find that version of you that is BETTER, morally speaking, than most men out there, you will die as you live now: broken and alone, being dated occasionally and left often.
Better wake up and see what's happening. And what's more, demand this setup you've been lured into be changed. ELIMINATE all divorce laws, DEMAND marriage before sex (thereby culling any man not serious about you), and let the chips fall where they may. You might even see romance make a comeback. Wouldn't that be just terrible.
Period. The End.
Don't be mad at me, I did not make you this way. Now. Let's be reasonable. THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH YOU, by and large. You are probably reasonably attractive (to someone, so throw that fashion-rag away), and you're not the world's most twisted and corrupt person, so you are a woman some man will consider marrying.
But no man is considering marrying you. Possibly not even your boyfriend. Seriously. Not even him.
Why?
You're not marriage material. If you were, you would be married.
You're too distrustful. Closed. A bit bitter. You play games. You feel justified in doing so because you're last 2 "boyfriends" (men who were loosely dating you, but not really interested) left you. You try to gain the upper hand in the relationship when your partner doesn't give a shit about upper hands and is trying to be a respected equal or even a superior who provides for you. You dodge personal questions. You slept with too many men. You wasted your innocence on a few jocks or tall, handsome Lotharios that a dozen other girls were after, and now you drink too much and share a whole lot less. You plot to trap a man into something long-term whilst staying defensive about anything long-term. You want someone to care deeply for you, but you won't allow yourself to care deeply for anyone else.
In short, you're emotionally broken. There is nothing wrong with you otherwise. In fact you may very well be a very loving, caring, generous person, and probably are. The sort of person who loves to volunteer and see children smile. But you royally screwed up your personal life because you listened to Hollywood and your own run-after-the-alpha-male instinct. If your parents gave you any personal advice, you ignored them and dismissed them as being old-fashioned and out-of-touch with what it takes to get a dominant man.
And now you're left with a big bag of broken heart and zero faith. The beta-males have now aged and become as emotionally intelligent as you, a day you thought would never come. They can smell this about you; the distrust. The fear. The cunning and waiting manipulation. The permanent loss of faith.
On top of everything lies the fact that in the case of divorce (which you are but a stone's throw away from), you get everything and your ex-husband is treated like a slave, quite literally. So you are, in essence, a landmine. If a man does not step carefully he is blown apart by you, especially financially. So your emotional stability - or lack thereof - is absolutely everything to a man, and you have not been taking care of yours.
Your moral integrity is as important as your reproductive integrity. Anyone telling you anything different IS LYING TO YOU (usually in order to extract money from you for fashion items or else for a cause - cough, feminism, cough).
Listen up: we want no part of it. None. We've seen two dozen girls like you and we know how this ends. With us getting tired of waiting for you to "come around," emotionally and mentally, and be vulnerable with us, or else we're convinced even when moving forward with you one of your hands has a divorce lawyer on speed dial. All while we question your ability to endure in a marriage. We know you hold ALL men in low esteem due to the actions of a few and we remember being passed over by the younger and prettier version of you cruising the jocks who everyone knew were only after sex (yes, the men are bitter too).
On the list of accomplishments of any decent man is "the love of a good woman." If you've thrown away your emotional integrity, you are not one of those.
In short, you've wasted far too much of what you had to offer and much of that is due to the environment you are living in; but ultimately you are responsible for what has happened to you, and if you don't find that version of you that is BETTER, morally speaking, than most men out there, you will die as you live now: broken and alone, being dated occasionally and left often.
Better wake up and see what's happening. And what's more, demand this setup you've been lured into be changed. ELIMINATE all divorce laws, DEMAND marriage before sex (thereby culling any man not serious about you), and let the chips fall where they may. You might even see romance make a comeback. Wouldn't that be just terrible.
Friday, March 11, 2016
Wednesday, July 22, 2015
Yup, Men are Still for Sale - Better Go Elsewhere
The point of this blog is that men are for sale. Men are individuals free to make their own choices until.... a woman enters the picture. Then they are more or less toast, financially speaking. Does that sound bitter? Sound far fetched? I'm afraid it isn't.
Men having been choosing and marrying women out of their free will for centuries, and supporting them and their children, voluntarily, despite being able to abandon them and leave at any time. The "power dynamic" has shifted, whatever that means (I guess there is some kind of power struggle happening that I wasn't aware of). Women now have control of their destiny and so everything is different. Later in this post, you might recall the old adage, "The more things change, the more they stay the same."
As a woman, if you date a man and have kids with him, out of wedlock, with or without his consent, you have successfully used, er, rented this man. Now you may sell (think "extort") him for monthly payments that could last the rest of your life. This is called 'child' support, even though it'll be in the thousands most likely and no child costs that much who isn't dipped in gold.
If you, as a woman, have married this man and had children with him, you have successfully bought him. Marriage doesn't happen much anymore. Why? See above. Marriage doesn't gain men much, if anything. In both cases women are legally entitled to his home, 40% of his income, and in the case of marriage, half his assets. But then, I lost half my assets and I wasn't married, so its pretty much 'anything goes.' You can close your mouth.
In either case, the moment a woman has children, her obligations, duties and responsibilities DON'T EXIST in this country. She has none. Zero. She must do nothing. She will be judged on nothing. She will be held to no standard, she must give no reason or excuse for divorce. She is not even suspected or considered a cause of the divorce. This nation has 'no fault' divorce, so there is no investigation or questions raised about fault or cause of a divorce. She can lie, cheat, steal, whatever she wants to do. Literally. It does not matter. If she's rich, the massive wealth transfer that is child support still stands. If she is poor, it still stands. If she is middle class, it still stands. If she has 10 children with 10 different men, it still stands. If she cheated on you, it still stands. If she told ten different men your baby is theirs or their baby is yours, it still stands (yes, more than one man may be legally forced to pay support for the same child. So far, just two have been forced to pay for the same child, but I'm sure we'll surpass that soon enough).
Given this license to blow out a man whenever she feels like it, and women's massive increase in education and earnings in the past forever, women have declared victory.
Good for them. High-five ladies. You are the "winners!" YES! The winners of..... of..... of.....well, what did they win, Bob?
I don't know. They won something. Money I guess. And power. And control. Now she can.... I don't know. What do women do again? Oh yes; buy a really, really nice handbag. French, no, Italian! And shoes. And dresses. And jewelry to impress your friends with. Unless your friends are married of course. Then they will pity you for being a lonely, superficial money-grubbing spinster who secretly cries herself to sleep at night. That is, unless you've rented a man after selling your first one. In which case... wait. Who in their right mind would marry a woman who totally financially crippled another man before you? Idiots I suppose (women who divorced for legitimate reasons including actual, real, abuse or who left their husband without blowing him out are exempt).
But basically, women have won. They don't need men anymore. Thank God. It was a real chore to need a man. So much work and time and what about a poor girl's career!?!? So its over now, we can all breathe a sigh of relief. They won.
So give up men. Just throw down your sword - you do have a sword don't you? This was a 'fight' of some kind, wasn't it? I mean, the women have won, so I assume there was some kind of.... competition or something.... right? A competition for.... the right to... I don't know. But I'm sure it existed. After all, there can't be a victor without a contest. Duh.
So where was I... oh yeah, Give Up Men! SHE has bested you in every category! So there. You have no role left. Ta-daaa. Once a man's role in the family is in extreme jeopardy or unnecessary, then HE is pretty much unnecessary and will, in all likelihood, give up. And you, wimpy, loser man, have lost. Your wife, er, ex-wife, makes more than you and has more education and lives in a really nice house with REALLY nice clothes. So fall to your loser knees and genuflect.
Just... stop getting married. After all, what person, man or woman, would enter into a contract, agreement, or partnership, of any kind, knowing that they will always 'lose?' A man, after all, can have all of his present AND FUTURE earnings legally stolen from him for no due cause (that is, adultery, alcoholism, abuse, etc.). And in that case, you would have to think that your wife was TOTALLY INCAPABLE of divorcing you because she met someone "better," experienced depression, mood swings, extreme selfishness, identity crisis, severe anxiety, or simply was unsure of your feelings toward her and decided to leave before she was left. And honestly, to be fair, very few human beings at all are totally incapable of those things, especially in the anxiety-filled, prozac-popping Western world.
So congratulations Ladies. You have won.... something. Do your touchdown dance. Woo Hoo.
My western brethren. Gentleman. It is time you embraced alternatives. I'm sorry. I wish this wasn't necessary. I know, I know. You fell in love. You saw her and you were sold for life. I know. She's all you ever wanted, her hair, her eyes, her creamy white skin, blah, blah, blah. But she's western, buddy. She's a western woman. West as in American, European, Canadien, etc.. She owns you the moment you have kids and/or get divorced. Your life BELONGS to her. Not in an emotional sense. IN A LEGAL/FINANCIAL sense. FOR LIFE. In divorce, well after you don't know her and don't care about her, SHE STILL OWNS YOU. And can actually DEMAND MORE OF YOUR MONEY (child support automatically goes up when kids hit 13). This may leave you penniless, depressed or even suicidal, as providing is essential to a man's self-worth. It matters not. You'll refuse to pay? The court will throw you in jail - JAIL JAIL. With hardened gangs and killers. No more life, no more anything. Do you see the kind of risk I'm talking about?
So I'm sorry, but forget all about her. It won't be an equal relationship because you hold nothing over her. The law is all on her side. It won't matter if she is the one who cheats, leaves, remarries, or makes more money than you do. So forget it. Now.
Let's talk about better options for you.
I would suggest considering 1) foreign born women, 2) remaining a permanent bachelor and dating forever (there are lots of lonely women out there), or else 3) embracing women of conservative faiths and religions who are serious about traditional marriage - see #1. Regardless of the cold stares and disgusted looks you'll receive from American women, you have no obligation to be with them and your refusal to consider them would be a big wake-up call to what women before them have done to their opportunities with American men.
But don't worry. Given you are smart, hard working and somewhat educated, YOU are in good shape. There are some truly LOVELY foreign women out there. The spanish, persians, indians, asians, greeks... simply gorgeous women. Wars have been fought over these ladies. Trust me. Plus, to them, you are not a guarantee, a slave or a puppet. You are not some guy who is going to "give her the children she is entitled to." If she wants children she is told she has to EARN them. That is what she was most likely taught, growing up. She must EARN them; that means BEING A GOOD WIFE. That includes, cooking, cleaning and keeping a good appearance for you in addition to any hobby or job she wants to do. In exchange, you must work hard, provide money and discipline for the children and routinely make love to her (yes, it will hurt her feelings if you don't). Good deal huh!?!? I thought so too. I weighed my options and decided this was the best option for me. Many men do. And for good reason - its a fair deal. And a deal's a deal. Its a deal set up to avoid divorce and keep the family intact.
Now I read articles in Western magazines asking where the "Real Men" are, I hear female coworkers and friends complain about the lack of available men with good jobs, and I read stories of college girls dancing with eachother for lack of available boys at parties, and its a pity. It really is. BUT THAT'S NOT OUR PROBLEM, brother. The law has decided to declare war on men at the behest of radical, bitter feminists, many of whom are quite clear in their objective to destroy and/or ruin as many men as they can. I'm very sorry that's the case, but be sure of it: THAT IS IN FACT THE CASE.
In lieu of this, I would like to congratulate you on your soon-to-be foreign born wife. And here's a tip: if she cooks good food all the time, brings you your robe and slippers and rubs your back, do not be alarmed! Do not argue! Do not stop her! This is what she was taught a good wife does! And she wants to be a good wife because.... SHE WANTS TO REMAIN MARRIED! So let her be a good wife! Don't look a gift horse in the mouth, friend! And by all means spoil her! Give her presents, massages, sex, clothes, brush her hair, and tell the kids how special their mother is! Don't worry, she's not Western! She won't see this as a sign of weakness or some kind of 'game' to be plotted against! She won't suspect you of trying to atone for cheating! She will become even more loving in return! Its a good deal, this option that I present you! Why it is a present unto itself. You could become a perma-bachelor or else celibate, or a monk or something, but I think the first option is better. Take it, sir.
Now you may have to convert to a religion that some consider radical... that is, a religion that doesn't believe young women should have reckless, drunken sex with men who will not marry them, a religion that believes killing the innocent is wrong, a religion that encourages honesty and integrity, that disavows irresponsibility, drug-use and prostitution, that believes women are sacred, powerful and beautiful, that protects children by keeping them within the sanctity of the family and which may declare non-believers to be confused, dangerous and immoral. But hey, you may believe some of those crazy ideas already, so this won't be any kind of radical adoption for you, now will it? So kiss your WASP ladies goodnight and wish them well, but tell them you just can't enter into an arrangement with them that puts you at their mercy like some kind of whipped, helpless puppy. After all, you're not a whipped, helpless puppy. You sir, are A MAN. And you'll do what you see to be fit, right and just. If the consequences are a bunch of cold, lonely, childless Western women, then so be it. Tell them not to feel bad.
After all....... they have won.
Men having been choosing and marrying women out of their free will for centuries, and supporting them and their children, voluntarily, despite being able to abandon them and leave at any time. The "power dynamic" has shifted, whatever that means (I guess there is some kind of power struggle happening that I wasn't aware of). Women now have control of their destiny and so everything is different. Later in this post, you might recall the old adage, "The more things change, the more they stay the same."
As a woman, if you date a man and have kids with him, out of wedlock, with or without his consent, you have successfully used, er, rented this man. Now you may sell (think "extort") him for monthly payments that could last the rest of your life. This is called 'child' support, even though it'll be in the thousands most likely and no child costs that much who isn't dipped in gold.
If you, as a woman, have married this man and had children with him, you have successfully bought him. Marriage doesn't happen much anymore. Why? See above. Marriage doesn't gain men much, if anything. In both cases women are legally entitled to his home, 40% of his income, and in the case of marriage, half his assets. But then, I lost half my assets and I wasn't married, so its pretty much 'anything goes.' You can close your mouth.
In either case, the moment a woman has children, her obligations, duties and responsibilities DON'T EXIST in this country. She has none. Zero. She must do nothing. She will be judged on nothing. She will be held to no standard, she must give no reason or excuse for divorce. She is not even suspected or considered a cause of the divorce. This nation has 'no fault' divorce, so there is no investigation or questions raised about fault or cause of a divorce. She can lie, cheat, steal, whatever she wants to do. Literally. It does not matter. If she's rich, the massive wealth transfer that is child support still stands. If she is poor, it still stands. If she is middle class, it still stands. If she has 10 children with 10 different men, it still stands. If she cheated on you, it still stands. If she told ten different men your baby is theirs or their baby is yours, it still stands (yes, more than one man may be legally forced to pay support for the same child. So far, just two have been forced to pay for the same child, but I'm sure we'll surpass that soon enough).
Given this license to blow out a man whenever she feels like it, and women's massive increase in education and earnings in the past forever, women have declared victory.
Good for them. High-five ladies. You are the "winners!" YES! The winners of..... of..... of.....well, what did they win, Bob?
I don't know. They won something. Money I guess. And power. And control. Now she can.... I don't know. What do women do again? Oh yes; buy a really, really nice handbag. French, no, Italian! And shoes. And dresses. And jewelry to impress your friends with. Unless your friends are married of course. Then they will pity you for being a lonely, superficial money-grubbing spinster who secretly cries herself to sleep at night. That is, unless you've rented a man after selling your first one. In which case... wait. Who in their right mind would marry a woman who totally financially crippled another man before you? Idiots I suppose (women who divorced for legitimate reasons including actual, real, abuse or who left their husband without blowing him out are exempt).
But basically, women have won. They don't need men anymore. Thank God. It was a real chore to need a man. So much work and time and what about a poor girl's career!?!? So its over now, we can all breathe a sigh of relief. They won.
So give up men. Just throw down your sword - you do have a sword don't you? This was a 'fight' of some kind, wasn't it? I mean, the women have won, so I assume there was some kind of.... competition or something.... right? A competition for.... the right to... I don't know. But I'm sure it existed. After all, there can't be a victor without a contest. Duh.
So where was I... oh yeah, Give Up Men! SHE has bested you in every category! So there. You have no role left. Ta-daaa. Once a man's role in the family is in extreme jeopardy or unnecessary, then HE is pretty much unnecessary and will, in all likelihood, give up. And you, wimpy, loser man, have lost. Your wife, er, ex-wife, makes more than you and has more education and lives in a really nice house with REALLY nice clothes. So fall to your loser knees and genuflect.
Just... stop getting married. After all, what person, man or woman, would enter into a contract, agreement, or partnership, of any kind, knowing that they will always 'lose?' A man, after all, can have all of his present AND FUTURE earnings legally stolen from him for no due cause (that is, adultery, alcoholism, abuse, etc.). And in that case, you would have to think that your wife was TOTALLY INCAPABLE of divorcing you because she met someone "better," experienced depression, mood swings, extreme selfishness, identity crisis, severe anxiety, or simply was unsure of your feelings toward her and decided to leave before she was left. And honestly, to be fair, very few human beings at all are totally incapable of those things, especially in the anxiety-filled, prozac-popping Western world.
So congratulations Ladies. You have won.... something. Do your touchdown dance. Woo Hoo.
My western brethren. Gentleman. It is time you embraced alternatives. I'm sorry. I wish this wasn't necessary. I know, I know. You fell in love. You saw her and you were sold for life. I know. She's all you ever wanted, her hair, her eyes, her creamy white skin, blah, blah, blah. But she's western, buddy. She's a western woman. West as in American, European, Canadien, etc.. She owns you the moment you have kids and/or get divorced. Your life BELONGS to her. Not in an emotional sense. IN A LEGAL/FINANCIAL sense. FOR LIFE. In divorce, well after you don't know her and don't care about her, SHE STILL OWNS YOU. And can actually DEMAND MORE OF YOUR MONEY (child support automatically goes up when kids hit 13). This may leave you penniless, depressed or even suicidal, as providing is essential to a man's self-worth. It matters not. You'll refuse to pay? The court will throw you in jail - JAIL JAIL. With hardened gangs and killers. No more life, no more anything. Do you see the kind of risk I'm talking about?
So I'm sorry, but forget all about her. It won't be an equal relationship because you hold nothing over her. The law is all on her side. It won't matter if she is the one who cheats, leaves, remarries, or makes more money than you do. So forget it. Now.
Let's talk about better options for you.
I would suggest considering 1) foreign born women, 2) remaining a permanent bachelor and dating forever (there are lots of lonely women out there), or else 3) embracing women of conservative faiths and religions who are serious about traditional marriage - see #1. Regardless of the cold stares and disgusted looks you'll receive from American women, you have no obligation to be with them and your refusal to consider them would be a big wake-up call to what women before them have done to their opportunities with American men.
But don't worry. Given you are smart, hard working and somewhat educated, YOU are in good shape. There are some truly LOVELY foreign women out there. The spanish, persians, indians, asians, greeks... simply gorgeous women. Wars have been fought over these ladies. Trust me. Plus, to them, you are not a guarantee, a slave or a puppet. You are not some guy who is going to "give her the children she is entitled to." If she wants children she is told she has to EARN them. That is what she was most likely taught, growing up. She must EARN them; that means BEING A GOOD WIFE. That includes, cooking, cleaning and keeping a good appearance for you in addition to any hobby or job she wants to do. In exchange, you must work hard, provide money and discipline for the children and routinely make love to her (yes, it will hurt her feelings if you don't). Good deal huh!?!? I thought so too. I weighed my options and decided this was the best option for me. Many men do. And for good reason - its a fair deal. And a deal's a deal. Its a deal set up to avoid divorce and keep the family intact.
Now I read articles in Western magazines asking where the "Real Men" are, I hear female coworkers and friends complain about the lack of available men with good jobs, and I read stories of college girls dancing with eachother for lack of available boys at parties, and its a pity. It really is. BUT THAT'S NOT OUR PROBLEM, brother. The law has decided to declare war on men at the behest of radical, bitter feminists, many of whom are quite clear in their objective to destroy and/or ruin as many men as they can. I'm very sorry that's the case, but be sure of it: THAT IS IN FACT THE CASE.
In lieu of this, I would like to congratulate you on your soon-to-be foreign born wife. And here's a tip: if she cooks good food all the time, brings you your robe and slippers and rubs your back, do not be alarmed! Do not argue! Do not stop her! This is what she was taught a good wife does! And she wants to be a good wife because.... SHE WANTS TO REMAIN MARRIED! So let her be a good wife! Don't look a gift horse in the mouth, friend! And by all means spoil her! Give her presents, massages, sex, clothes, brush her hair, and tell the kids how special their mother is! Don't worry, she's not Western! She won't see this as a sign of weakness or some kind of 'game' to be plotted against! She won't suspect you of trying to atone for cheating! She will become even more loving in return! Its a good deal, this option that I present you! Why it is a present unto itself. You could become a perma-bachelor or else celibate, or a monk or something, but I think the first option is better. Take it, sir.
Now you may have to convert to a religion that some consider radical... that is, a religion that doesn't believe young women should have reckless, drunken sex with men who will not marry them, a religion that believes killing the innocent is wrong, a religion that encourages honesty and integrity, that disavows irresponsibility, drug-use and prostitution, that believes women are sacred, powerful and beautiful, that protects children by keeping them within the sanctity of the family and which may declare non-believers to be confused, dangerous and immoral. But hey, you may believe some of those crazy ideas already, so this won't be any kind of radical adoption for you, now will it? So kiss your WASP ladies goodnight and wish them well, but tell them you just can't enter into an arrangement with them that puts you at their mercy like some kind of whipped, helpless puppy. After all, you're not a whipped, helpless puppy. You sir, are A MAN. And you'll do what you see to be fit, right and just. If the consequences are a bunch of cold, lonely, childless Western women, then so be it. Tell them not to feel bad.
After all....... they have won.
There is a word for it....
MISUNDERSTANDING is the word you are looking for.
And its the reason why the author writes for Cracked.com and isn't practicing law.
http://www.cracked.com/personal-experiences-1758-5-things-i-learned-committing-campus-sexual-assault.html
There's another term apparently no one outside of law school knows - "mens rea," its latin. And it means you have to INTEND to commit a wrong when you do it. Its the difference between an accident and a crime.
Ever play sports? Well when you stick your elbow out when playing hockey and someone falls into it, its not a penalty. But if someone nears you and you see them and then jab them in the ribs with your elbow, intentionally, its clearly a penalty. Players who try to blur this line are called "dirty" and "scumbag."
The same rule applies in the legal system under which you live. If a man is flirting with a girl all night (slapping her butt? Not really just-friends stuff, is it?), and then later starts to take a few liberties touching her as she's LYING ON HIM, pauses, hears no rebuke, and continues, then he's not really a rapist, is he? Is he overstepping his bounds? Perhaps. But he's not trying to hurt her and I would PRESUME (call me a monster if you wish) that she has a mouth that works, right? So she can speak up AT. ANY. TIME. As women have down for 3 millenia. Or are you quiet, foolish, mousey little dolls too sweet and innocent to possibly object to the caveman you have placed yourself with?
Please.
That's an insult to women everywhere. If you can't speak up ladies, DON'T BE WITH A MAN, NOT EVER. 95% of men out there want to PLEASE you physically, not hurt you. But young men are fairly awkward in attempting this. He should've spoken up, sure, but its not uncommon for first encounters to be quite silent. Again, men have always labored under the impression that unwanted advances are met with a push, slap, harsh word, some sort of objection. Silence? Doesn't exactly say "this is horrible. stop now." I have literally been told "stop" - and it meant stop one kind of touching (but don't stop altogether), and no, I'm not confused on that, I confirmed it. This can happen. Everyone's playing the situation by ear.
In an age where women are as educated, rich, and powerful as they have ever been, why on earth would men suddenly expect them to turn into a silent mouse who can't find the right words!?!?!?!
Does that make sense to you? It doesn't to me. I'm not the only one who has figured it out, as many women also blame women in these fuzzy-no-harm-intended-cases. No, these "blaming women" are not brainwashed, THEY'RE JUST NOT NAIVE. By the way that's a whole another volume of articles - the difference between naive women and innocent ones - men love innocent women, but are often astounded by how naive they are - this stark difference just adds dynamite to the sparking gas can of male-female relations.
Now in this case, the girl simply fell asleep - but she woke up, halfway through and both of them were still clothed, no one was pregnant, so no real harm was done save her embarrassment and the awkwardness of it all. Further evidence of no wrong doing - she didn't report the incident until days later. Odds are she didn't know how she felt about the whole thing. Young women can be pretty dense too. She was having fun and just ran with it. The moron guy (we're all morons at that age) did not tenderly contact her afterward and say I adore you, I want you, I need to be with you, etc. as he too was embarrassed, and missing this key declaration, the girl felt understandably used in all likelihood - not a pleasant feeling. So did she tell him he tresspassed? No. She did a far more reasonable thing - she accused him of an actual crime. Brilliant, sweetie.
Men don't continue with touching when at first it doesn't work - THEY THINK THEY MERELY NEED TO DO SOMETHING DIFFERENT IN ORDER TO STIMULATE YOU, LADIES.
Well the crime this poor boy was accused of is bunk from moment 1 and she knows it. Because the man didn't intend to hurt her at all. He had no idea she was asleep and in fact takes responsibility and blames himself. These two are simply incredibly young and naive and didn't communicate when they needed to. He didn't hurt her at all and regrets the entire incident - not exactly the mark of a guilty mind.
He intended no harm and mostly she received no harm. Oh and what do you know, alcohol was involved.
Go figure.
And its the reason why the author writes for Cracked.com and isn't practicing law.
http://www.cracked.com/personal-experiences-1758-5-things-i-learned-committing-campus-sexual-assault.html
There's another term apparently no one outside of law school knows - "mens rea," its latin. And it means you have to INTEND to commit a wrong when you do it. Its the difference between an accident and a crime.
Ever play sports? Well when you stick your elbow out when playing hockey and someone falls into it, its not a penalty. But if someone nears you and you see them and then jab them in the ribs with your elbow, intentionally, its clearly a penalty. Players who try to blur this line are called "dirty" and "scumbag."
The same rule applies in the legal system under which you live. If a man is flirting with a girl all night (slapping her butt? Not really just-friends stuff, is it?), and then later starts to take a few liberties touching her as she's LYING ON HIM, pauses, hears no rebuke, and continues, then he's not really a rapist, is he? Is he overstepping his bounds? Perhaps. But he's not trying to hurt her and I would PRESUME (call me a monster if you wish) that she has a mouth that works, right? So she can speak up AT. ANY. TIME. As women have down for 3 millenia. Or are you quiet, foolish, mousey little dolls too sweet and innocent to possibly object to the caveman you have placed yourself with?
Please.
That's an insult to women everywhere. If you can't speak up ladies, DON'T BE WITH A MAN, NOT EVER. 95% of men out there want to PLEASE you physically, not hurt you. But young men are fairly awkward in attempting this. He should've spoken up, sure, but its not uncommon for first encounters to be quite silent. Again, men have always labored under the impression that unwanted advances are met with a push, slap, harsh word, some sort of objection. Silence? Doesn't exactly say "this is horrible. stop now." I have literally been told "stop" - and it meant stop one kind of touching (but don't stop altogether), and no, I'm not confused on that, I confirmed it. This can happen. Everyone's playing the situation by ear.
In an age where women are as educated, rich, and powerful as they have ever been, why on earth would men suddenly expect them to turn into a silent mouse who can't find the right words!?!?!?!
Does that make sense to you? It doesn't to me. I'm not the only one who has figured it out, as many women also blame women in these fuzzy-no-harm-intended-cases. No, these "blaming women" are not brainwashed, THEY'RE JUST NOT NAIVE. By the way that's a whole another volume of articles - the difference between naive women and innocent ones - men love innocent women, but are often astounded by how naive they are - this stark difference just adds dynamite to the sparking gas can of male-female relations.
Now in this case, the girl simply fell asleep - but she woke up, halfway through and both of them were still clothed, no one was pregnant, so no real harm was done save her embarrassment and the awkwardness of it all. Further evidence of no wrong doing - she didn't report the incident until days later. Odds are she didn't know how she felt about the whole thing. Young women can be pretty dense too. She was having fun and just ran with it. The moron guy (we're all morons at that age) did not tenderly contact her afterward and say I adore you, I want you, I need to be with you, etc. as he too was embarrassed, and missing this key declaration, the girl felt understandably used in all likelihood - not a pleasant feeling. So did she tell him he tresspassed? No. She did a far more reasonable thing - she accused him of an actual crime. Brilliant, sweetie.
Men don't continue with touching when at first it doesn't work - THEY THINK THEY MERELY NEED TO DO SOMETHING DIFFERENT IN ORDER TO STIMULATE YOU, LADIES.
Well the crime this poor boy was accused of is bunk from moment 1 and she knows it. Because the man didn't intend to hurt her at all. He had no idea she was asleep and in fact takes responsibility and blames himself. These two are simply incredibly young and naive and didn't communicate when they needed to. He didn't hurt her at all and regrets the entire incident - not exactly the mark of a guilty mind.
He intended no harm and mostly she received no harm. Oh and what do you know, alcohol was involved.
Go figure.
Wednesday, June 24, 2015
When Alone, Feminism is Perfect and Unfallible, When Part of a Couple.....
... feminism is quickly discarded like a dirty, damp dish rag:
http://thelibertarianrepublic.com/woman-gets-boyfriend-no-longer-a-feminist/
...in other words, modern feminism is nothing more than a set of (bigoted) rationalizations that can be used by women to make themselves feel better when they are alone, depressed, and looking for someone or something to blame.
http://thelibertarianrepublic.com/woman-gets-boyfriend-no-longer-a-feminist/
...in other words, modern feminism is nothing more than a set of (bigoted) rationalizations that can be used by women to make themselves feel better when they are alone, depressed, and looking for someone or something to blame.
Monday, June 22, 2015
Who Is Teaching Our Daughters to be Psycho Femi-nazis?
This lady:
Professor Says Fake Rape Story “Rings True” and Calls For “Men Control”
By: Laura Meyers
Its fun to attack psychotic social justice
warriors’ fallacies. But even when such claims are debunked right in
front of them, they still claim that the fake injustices are real
problems. They just make it too easy sometimes.
Last year, Rolling Stones‘
journalistic integrity took a hit when the magazine ran the rape story
as truth and permanently damaged a fraternity’s and students’
reputations when it was later learned that the allegations were false.
An independent review of the coverage was
printed in Rolling Stones’ April 2015 edition, and despite the admission
of untruth, Ashwini Tambe, a women’s studies professor from the
University of Maryland this the fake rape story “rings so true.”
Worth asking: why DID ‘Jackie”s story about #frathouserape ring so true to #RollingStone editors? Maybe bc #campusrapeculture is a thing
— Ashwini Tambe (@ashwinitambe) April 6, 2015
And the professor has had other questionable Tweets during her time as a revolutionary social media activist.
Remember that time she said we needed “men control?”
And remember that time she compared Charlie
Hebdo, the victim in the Je Suis Charlie bombing, to Rush Limbaugh? And
when she said she’d feel “uneasy” about people supporting Rush, as they
did with Charlie?
Personally I’d feel more “uneasy” about the whole bombing part, but what do I know, you know?
Oh yeah, and she wants women’s studies taught in high schools, because #rape.
What a cool gal. Arguing injustice even
when your claims are proven false shows true dedication to the cause.
Way to go, professor.
Thursday, June 11, 2015
Man, unconscious, Sexullay Assaulted and then expelled
First men stopped courting women, then they stopped marrying, pretty soon ladies, men will avoid you ALTOGETHER. STOP THE MADNESS!
http://reason.com/blog/2015/06/11/amherst-student-was-expelled-for-rape-bu
http://reason.com/blog/2015/06/11/amherst-student-was-expelled-for-rape-bu
Thursday, June 04, 2015
Wednesday, May 13, 2015
Thursday, January 22, 2015
Drunk Driving Argument Twisted and Mangled by Idiot
This is normally a pretty good site, but the author fumbles this one, pretty badly.
http://libertyviral.com/graphic-some-people-think-drunk-driving-should-be-legal-heres-why-i-disagree/#
He sets up a strawman, and its a horrible strawman to boot.
He claims libertarians want drunk driving to be legal. First off, that's wrong, libertarians simply think its possible to drive safely after having a few glasses of wine and that the state-mandated .08 standard of "legally drunk," is a total joke that gets people thrown in jail who have HURT NO ONE and demonstrated NO reckless behavior of any kind. Secondly, he claims that "drunk driving" is horrible and "this video of a drunk driver slamming into a pedestrian is one of the million reason why," followed up by a horribly drunked driver (probably 1.6 intoxicated, not .08).
Who the Hell would defend a driver slamming into a pedestrian DRUNK OR NOT?!?!!?!?!
DO YOU THINK IT MATTERS TO THE PEDESTRIAN!?!?!?! Moron.
Secondly, RECKLESS driving is what the author MEANS must be outlawed, not drunk driving. He gives examples of reckless driving and then tells you that not only is that drunk driving, that is the driving of everyone who has taken a sip of alcohol and gotten behind the wheel. Its a slick move but its logical shit and he knows it; if he doesn't, he's an idiot.
There are simply bad drivers out there. We don't know who they are until they do something to reveal themselves. I'm sad this is the case, but I'm not outlawing cars for everyone or demanding everyone retake their driver's test every year to smoke out the potential accidents waiting to happen.
How about falling asleep at the wheel (and killing people) - is that EXTRA bad because sleeping is horrible and puts others at risk!?!?! Let's make it illegal to drive on less than 7 hours sleep. Cuz, hey - this is about safety; no, even better - its about the safety of children! Innocent children riding in cards demand you get 8 hours sleep or else not drive, you selfish prick. Bang. On the books. Do it.
Reckless driving is the problem. Consuming alcohol doesn't help, certainly, and I don't advise you do it, but consuming alcohol affects everyone differently (I tended bar for years), and they need to exercise judgement before driving, regardless of their alcohol consumption. Period.
The problem is that you can have a few drinks AND NOT DRIVE RECKLESSLY. You can go home perfectly safe.
Now we get on to measuring risk: "...here’s the problem with the argument that all drunk driving which doesn’t inflict harm should be legal. It doesn’t take into the factor of aggression by risk taking. It’s akin to firing a gun up in the air, which my father taught me NEVER EVER to do. Why? Because sure, even if there’s an almost zero chance that you will hurt someone, what happens when you do? It’s one thing to take risks with your own life. It’s quite another to take risks with other people’s lives."
Bullshit. The cop with a gun puts my life at risk, but he needs it to do his job, so I live with that risk. People need their cars to travel, so you live with the risk of bad drivers and those who have a beer or two; even with those that are sleepy. Texting while driving is just as dangerous as drinking and driving (more so) and so is being sleepy at the wheel. So what do you want to do Mr. Wrap-everything-in-bubblewrap!?!?!? Outlaw less than 8 hours sleep before driving? Make it a felony to possess a text message device while driving? No. Neither lack of sleep nor cell phones matter UNTIL YOUR ABUSE OF THEM CAUSE YOU TO DRIVE RECKLESSLY.
ITS THE RECKLESS DRIVING that's the problem, THE CAUSE IS IRRELEVANT. Further AGAINST his point is the fact that millions of people have a few drinks at night (and yes, blow a .08 - legally "under the influence" - oh, the state is careful not to say drunk, cuz you know, odds are you're not and they want to arrest you anyway) - and then safely drive home, making sure to swerve out of the way of text'ers and sleep-deprived college kids and truckers. They are in full control of their vehicle and their reflexes have not taken a decline or else a significant enough decline to prevent them from operating the motor vehicle safely. And no, I don't drive drunk and do not advocate anyone else do either. I also don't advocate driving sleepy or texting while driving, in case you care.
And lastly this blithering fool does not ask where his suggestions lead - as he is advocating OUTLAWING BEHAVIOR and NOT end results. It leads to the Nanny-state, the Police-infested, spying, communist nation I find myself in today. Where my own small opinions on this small little blog are most likely monitored by the FBI as "subversive" or "potentially gorilla/anarchist/anti-federal" in nature.
So pat yourself on the back Mr. "Liberty Viral," you just advocated anything but Liberty.
Moron.
-JB
http://libertyviral.com/graphic-some-people-think-drunk-driving-should-be-legal-heres-why-i-disagree/#
He sets up a strawman, and its a horrible strawman to boot.
He claims libertarians want drunk driving to be legal. First off, that's wrong, libertarians simply think its possible to drive safely after having a few glasses of wine and that the state-mandated .08 standard of "legally drunk," is a total joke that gets people thrown in jail who have HURT NO ONE and demonstrated NO reckless behavior of any kind. Secondly, he claims that "drunk driving" is horrible and "this video of a drunk driver slamming into a pedestrian is one of the million reason why," followed up by a horribly drunked driver (probably 1.6 intoxicated, not .08).
Who the Hell would defend a driver slamming into a pedestrian DRUNK OR NOT?!?!!?!?!
DO YOU THINK IT MATTERS TO THE PEDESTRIAN!?!?!?! Moron.
Secondly, RECKLESS driving is what the author MEANS must be outlawed, not drunk driving. He gives examples of reckless driving and then tells you that not only is that drunk driving, that is the driving of everyone who has taken a sip of alcohol and gotten behind the wheel. Its a slick move but its logical shit and he knows it; if he doesn't, he's an idiot.
There are simply bad drivers out there. We don't know who they are until they do something to reveal themselves. I'm sad this is the case, but I'm not outlawing cars for everyone or demanding everyone retake their driver's test every year to smoke out the potential accidents waiting to happen.
How about falling asleep at the wheel (and killing people) - is that EXTRA bad because sleeping is horrible and puts others at risk!?!?! Let's make it illegal to drive on less than 7 hours sleep. Cuz, hey - this is about safety; no, even better - its about the safety of children! Innocent children riding in cards demand you get 8 hours sleep or else not drive, you selfish prick. Bang. On the books. Do it.
Reckless driving is the problem. Consuming alcohol doesn't help, certainly, and I don't advise you do it, but consuming alcohol affects everyone differently (I tended bar for years), and they need to exercise judgement before driving, regardless of their alcohol consumption. Period.
The problem is that you can have a few drinks AND NOT DRIVE RECKLESSLY. You can go home perfectly safe.
Now we get on to measuring risk: "...here’s the problem with the argument that all drunk driving which doesn’t inflict harm should be legal. It doesn’t take into the factor of aggression by risk taking. It’s akin to firing a gun up in the air, which my father taught me NEVER EVER to do. Why? Because sure, even if there’s an almost zero chance that you will hurt someone, what happens when you do? It’s one thing to take risks with your own life. It’s quite another to take risks with other people’s lives."
Bullshit. The cop with a gun puts my life at risk, but he needs it to do his job, so I live with that risk. People need their cars to travel, so you live with the risk of bad drivers and those who have a beer or two; even with those that are sleepy. Texting while driving is just as dangerous as drinking and driving (more so) and so is being sleepy at the wheel. So what do you want to do Mr. Wrap-everything-in-bubblewrap!?!?!? Outlaw less than 8 hours sleep before driving? Make it a felony to possess a text message device while driving? No. Neither lack of sleep nor cell phones matter UNTIL YOUR ABUSE OF THEM CAUSE YOU TO DRIVE RECKLESSLY.
ITS THE RECKLESS DRIVING that's the problem, THE CAUSE IS IRRELEVANT. Further AGAINST his point is the fact that millions of people have a few drinks at night (and yes, blow a .08 - legally "under the influence" - oh, the state is careful not to say drunk, cuz you know, odds are you're not and they want to arrest you anyway) - and then safely drive home, making sure to swerve out of the way of text'ers and sleep-deprived college kids and truckers. They are in full control of their vehicle and their reflexes have not taken a decline or else a significant enough decline to prevent them from operating the motor vehicle safely. And no, I don't drive drunk and do not advocate anyone else do either. I also don't advocate driving sleepy or texting while driving, in case you care.
And lastly this blithering fool does not ask where his suggestions lead - as he is advocating OUTLAWING BEHAVIOR and NOT end results. It leads to the Nanny-state, the Police-infested, spying, communist nation I find myself in today. Where my own small opinions on this small little blog are most likely monitored by the FBI as "subversive" or "potentially gorilla/anarchist/anti-federal" in nature.
So pat yourself on the back Mr. "Liberty Viral," you just advocated anything but Liberty.
Moron.
-JB
Sunday, December 28, 2014
Tuesday, December 23, 2014
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)