Movie "Cuties" is Thinly-veiled Child Porn

 First off, the title. 

Who are they trying to fool?

It's reminiscent of a dirty old pedophile looking at a prepubescent girl or boy and saying with a filthy sly "There's a cutie." With an expression that lingers too long in the wrong areas. With a creepy vibe. 

WTAF.

What is wrong with the general public? Even the vaunted New Yorker stooped to defending the film, calling it sexual "empowerment."

The girls in the movie are ELEVEN - 11 - years old. That's one-one. 

One year older than TEN. 

Sexual...what!?!?!? Is the NY author a pedo too? Jesus Christ. The film's backers defended it and demanded the critics watch it. 

So they did. And?

They screamed IT'S WORSE THAN WE PREVIOUSLY THOUGHT (they're right).

11 year old CHILDREN gyrating and pounding their hips into the ground? GIRLS. Slapping each other's butts AS they gyrate? It's what called "posing" the kids, by the authorities and psychoanalysts. And in this case, far worse: sexually lewd dancing and suggestive body movement. It's like asking Kim Kardashian or some very curvy woman to wear a slinky outfit and move along the ground like a snake... It's not a silly little game... it's sexually alluring, and it's done for a purpose - something ALL ADULTS understand. 

The defense of the movie is comically ridiculous. And the spin put on it, equally ridiculous: that the movie is a narrative condemning the sexualization of children. This is like saying I'm going to demonize rape by making a movie in which women are horribly raped: illustrating the horror of it by.... committing the crime itself. 

Uhhh.... I'm afraid it doesn't work like that. We don't illustrate the horrors of war BY ACTUALLY KILLING LIVE ACTORS. And we don't exploit children to reveal how they are exploited.

First off, this movie has no "ah ha" moment where you, the viewer. understand the kids were exploited or someone in the film sees the folly in what they are doing. Secondly, a movie like this can be made.... by 21 yo actors who look young and are playing 15-17 yo adolescents. THAT WASN'T DONE HERE. The actors were either 11 or only SLIGHTLY older - NOT in a position to make an adult decision about what they are doing. 

The director - an African woman living in France - is a kind of pedophile. 

In this case, using the girls, posing them, dancing them about, this gives her a sort of power - she controls what she thinks men want, she exercises power over the girls and gains a satisfaction that way, and in all ways feels more powerful than she otherwise would. If you accept men like young women, and some may even fantasize about teenage girls... then this "director" has something akin to that - very young girls (beyond the limits of what is a "sexy girl" in my view, these are children, and NOT sexy in any way), that she is making do sexually playful things and, in a way, teasing and taunting men who like that, as well as tempting them (again, for the men into that sort of thing), even sadistically reveling herself in this power.

In times of riches or chaos pedophiles come out of the woodwork. They always pitch the same garbage - rationalizing their disorders. It's a "see, you like this too" (no, we don't), attempt to fit into the mainstream. Or it is an attempt to pass off their bizarre fetish as a normal trait: "see, this isn't out of the ordinary or strange" (yes, it is). Every attempt they make to blend in their disgusting fetish instantly stands out for what is: bizarre sexual attention aimed at children. 

The director and all adults involved, including those at Netflix need to be arrested for creating and distributing child pornography. 

Now. 

They should also be hit with the MAXIMUM sentence allowed under the law. This is wholly unacceptable. That society has even allowed this film to be made is horrifying and unforgivable. 

Another very good take on the "film:" https://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2020/09/10/cuties-review-dull-and-indefensible/

VIRUS IS A SCAM

Not saying real people are not dying BECAUSE THEY ARE, but the average age of a coronavirus death in Massachusetts is 82.

8-frickin'-2.

People, the average life expectancy in the USA is 78.

The bulk of deaths are either in nursing homes or hospitals. Anyone under the age of 40, and, if healthy, 50 or 60, IS IN NO. DANGER.

WTF are you wearing a mask for?

Go about your lives for chrissake.

THE VIRUS IS NOT DANGEROUS TO THE GENERAL POPULATION.

Here: the Germans have figured out THE FRAUD:

https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2020/05/29/german-official-leaks-report-denouncing-corona-as-global-false-alarm/

Kobe: No Saint, But....

I'm no Kobe Bryant fan.

But I temper my opinion of him and I learn from him and you should also.

Here's why:

He was no Christian saint. He was supposedly a Catholic. Uh, not a practicing one, apparently as he was accused of sleeping with over 100 women NOT his wife after his marriage.

That said, raising 4 daughters to be Catholic - that is, restrained, pious, and conservative, is not a bad thing, especially in these ultra-liberal times.  Note: HE'S NOT ALONE IN THAT, and several other athletes insist their daughters live conservative, measured lives with stable morals. Gee, I wonder why.

Kobe was, DUH, a liberal playboy. Jesus, $100 million contract and an All-Star before the age of 25? The man worshipped himself. Which is always ugly. But predictable. Most people would in his shoes. And the women? I'm disgusted, but most likely many were excited to be with such a superstar like him - note, I suspect some, I know not how many, were NOT anticipating sleeping with him.

Like many playboys he was given so much so young, it went to his head and he became a spoiled rotten prince of a person. I've met some super sexy young ladies who were VILE human beings, and their good looks EVAPORATED in my eyes. They were the sort of people who would treat every relationship like a game, always jockeying for position and leverage. The sort of people to make you happy to die alone.

His sports-nicknames he coined... himself. Egotistical and egocentric. Disgusting.

As he aged it sounded like he was a decent father to his daughters and he mellowed. He matured.

He could've gotten divorced, he didn't.

He set up a charity - he didn't have to do that.

He invested in business ventures, putting over $100 million into new firms. He didn't have to do that.

He admitted that, at least in one case, the woman he had sex with DID NOT view events as he did and was hurt as a result of his actions. Stand up thing to do, but this doesn't justify his actions.

He was clearly an insensitive young man, hyper-stimulated, and prone to expect favors and women, WHICH DISGUSTS ME.

But to be fair, while he had some ugly sides and some ugly actions (which he somewhat paid for), he did do some good things in life and left his earnings to either his family, charity, or business ventures, which is a positive contribution to society.

I only wish more young women looked at him with skepticism and distrust, knowing damn well he was an enriched, spoiled athlete, who expected everything be laid at his feet, including people. The guy should've been playing a few nights, at least, with a split lip and black eye. He certainly asked for it.

Ladies: YOUNG MEN NEED TIME TO MATURE. DO NOT TRUST THEM OR GIVE THEM ANYTHING WITHOUT DISCIPLINE BEING ATTACHED TO IT, TYPICALLY IN THE FORM OF A LONG-TERM RELATIONSHIP.

Kobe, after all, is only one-half of the problem.

OMG. Female Derranged Argument. Broken.

This is from the left's latest crackpot nut job movie - marriage story. It's actually not that bad, I have to say. But it's seems to profess the typical shit: man made mistake so he loses everything, cuz that's life. Wifey was unhappy and confused for a bit, so she gets it all. Lesson to men: don't bother with marriage, you're bound to lose. Only male losers have nothing to lose in marriage, so that's what you're stuck with, girls. Learn to love the bums.

Synopsis:
Scarlett Johansonn and her husband, Adam Driver, get a divorce. Their marriage is falling apart. They seem to want different things, but in actuality, they're mostly fine. They're going thru what many couples go through. In this story he was once young and hot and upcoming, a hotshot director and she's some random actress in his play - they marry and they're great. Happy, have a son. Her lifestyle gets a 1,000% bump. Then she stops sleeping with him.... for a year. Ugh. That's a very long time for a young man. So he sleeps with someone else - NOT ok, but this is what he does. This is a catch-22 setup by the filmmakers. You understand his cheating, a little, but it's not really justifiable.

The problem is, they have a son. They never should've had children, they don't seem to have a stable relationship. BIG MISTAKE on both their parts (of course, only he'll be blamed and pay).

Now they're blaming each other. No one wins. I can argue who is right and who is wrong, both ways.

In this particular instance, he got married before he was ready, but played a great husband and father, for the most part. However, he was young and hot and when his wife stopped sleeping with him, it hurt his feelings and he went elsewhere - rather understandable in a way, but not justifiable. Now her lawyer will ask for the moon and probably get it. And he's expected to show up every other night, playing drop off and pickup, playing help-ex-wifey-cuz-the-gate-is-stuck. Post-divorce is a comedy; young men are disgusted. What they see and hear is "men have responsibilities, but not women." Pay for her to live in your old house while you scrap by in a tiny shack? F-you. What do you expect them to say? Rape me blind? LOLOLOLOL. You're in dreamland ladies. Wake up before it's too late.

You ladies don't get it: WHAT THIS MOVIE SAYS IS: THIS IS WHAT HAPPENS TO GOOD GUYS. THIS IS WHAT HAPPENS TO MEN WITH ONE SLIP UP. YOU LOSE EVERYTHING, BUT STILL HAVE TO STICK AROUND TO HELP OUT AND PAY HER. LOLOLOLOL.

Young men's response to this? - I WILL NEVER, EVER, EVER GET MARRIED. Older men feel some sense of duty to support or help in some way the mother of their child. Young men who grew up in the women-first, men-second, oh but you're-both-equals-world? They say Fuck. Off. "She makes more than me anyway. Ship off." Those guys have NO incentive to help, so they're walking away FOR. EVER. No help, no pickups, NOTHING. Chase them around the country for child support if you'd like, but you can forget ANY cooperation.

Women in this country are setup to fail and they're left with nothing but bitterness and confusion while watching their female Indian neighbor having holidays and weekends going places with a husband and kids. Wondering how that woman has so much and she, nothing at all.

Self-righteous Femi-nazi crap, girls. Just say no. Not sleeping with your husband is a serious screw up. You must talk to him to help find out how he can make you feel like sleeping with him as young men are designed for sex and it hurts their feelings to be ignored like that. 1 year? That's absurd. That's her screw up.

Video Clip
Below is Scarlett Johansonn's attorney, who is of course, a feminazi nut-ball. In this clip, she's ranting about how women accept imperfect men (this is a shock? everyone is imperfect, you moron), but women, HAVE TO BE PERFECT, cuz, the virgin Mary.

WHAT!?!?!?

No one I've ever met expects women to be perfect.

THIS ---> Men want a sexy woman who maybe cooks a bit. And doesn't cheat. And if she cleaned a bit and didn't bitch about it, there would literally be duels over her. I know - not think - KNOW all of you ladies can do that. ALL of you.

But women are so sensitive and so BIOLOGICALLY PROGRAMMED to do what is expected of them, that they are easy prey for ADVERTISING firms. These companies make women feel inadequate and sell them push-up bras, make-up (a BILLION dollar industry), hair products, nail products, clothing, shoes, and handbags. And then, women are left STILL feeling imperfect, because the men are a little ticked that their would-be wife has taken on a big student loan, taken a job that might've been his, out earns him, and with her income, instead of saving for a family (cuz that's the "man's job," you know) she has blown it all on consumer items trying to look 10% better.

I feel for you ladies and what society does to you is disgusting, but you've done this to yourself. What Laura Dern is implying with her speech below is that her client was expected to be perfect and she wasn't and that expectation drove her nuts (um, all of her own doing!), and because of all that.....  she has some sort of "right" to divorce her otherwise fine-but-flawed husband (who loves her) and make a fortune in doing so.

It's the classic lawyer scam: "Life-for-women-is-impossible-so-Marriage-for-women-is-impossible-so-you-were-bound-to-get-divorced-and-divorced-women-get-money."

That is all bullshit. It is subterfuge. Misleading. Fallacious. One does not follow from the other. Feeling imperfect doesn't give her the right to divorce her husband (WHO IS NOT DIVORCING HER), and demand custody, alimony, child support, etc.. Further, most husbands, this one included, go out of their way to make their wives feel good about themselves. Again: ONLY the old marriage agreement makes sense: if she wants to walk away, she can - it's a free country! But she walks away with nothing in that case. If she gets the kitchen sink when she walks away, then she has EVERY INCENTIVE to walk away as she can simply separate a man from his earnings. That is beyond backwards. But go tell the Middle East the path to paradise is to let women vote. Cuz you're really smart.

Also, life got really hard for women the moment they demanded to work en masse. Then everything was priced for 2 incomes and being an ultra-successful man proved all but impossible - oh and to be that guy AFTER divorce? LOL. Fuhgeddaboutit. Any young, handsome millennial man would be nuts to get married. Enjoy your loneliness ladies..