Friday, December 08, 2017

Cops shoot unarmed man, on floor

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-42277309


W-T-F.

I started out being sympathetic because the victim was a 4 star moron, brandishing a pellet gun in a hotel room such that other people saw him and called the hotel staff, who called the police. What a bonehead. But this is part of the police's job: evaluate whether there is a real threat and then deal with it. Further, the cops these days show up ready to assault Fort Knox, and should damn well be confident in their firepower.

Long story, short, they get this moron and his female companion out in the hallway, where its obvious they are both unarmed and scared. All they have to do is get them to lay down and spread eagle, or else spread eagle against a wall and walk up behind them and handcuff them. This ain't Bonnie and Clyde. Its two unarmed idiots who are (like most people), wetting their pants at the sight of storm troopers in flak jackets and automatic rifles.

The cops are only slightly less stupid, it seems. They start lecturing the two idiots who are too scared to think and can barely follow instructions. I've given instructions for a few years now in Karate and you don't lecture: EVER. Many students simply can't keep up and many don't process information fast enough to make the lectures worth it in the middle of instructions for striking, blocking, etc..You keep instruction simple and easy and short.

So instead of walking over and handcuffing these two - WHO ARE CLEARLY SCARED, AND NOT THAT BRIGHT - ONE IS CRYING - the cops give them instructions to get on their knees and crawl towards them? Why? They are immobile and still - AND HARMLESS. If one quickly moved to their waistband or quickly did something to provoke an attack, and the cops responded, fine. But the cops give a series of bizarre instructions which the idiots are having trouble following (so then just make them sit still and move to them), and when crawling, the man's oversized pants fall; instinctually, he reaches down to pull his pants up (stupid) and the cops unloads on him with his automatic weapon.

First off, with both "assailants" (who had hurt no one) on the ground, if you want to talk to them, you can ask them if they have a gun and ask what sort of gun it is (yes, they can lie, but most cops see right through lies). ODDS ARE they are not carrying an automatic weapon, so just confirm its a couple of idiots and not a team of ex-Seals ready to repel borders (highly unlikely). You see two fools, man and woman, sloppily dressed, no body armor, no sidearm, no rifle, NOTHING, then guess what? You get them down, handcuff them and slap them on the wrist in court for being stupid; but brandishing a pellet gun isn't a life-or-death situation. GOOD cops (rarer and rarer), can figure this out.

These two cops acted like this was a video game. They shot people they thought were ready and prepared to kill them. These two were both scared and stupid; at worst one was reaching for a handgun (but had his head down), and was preparing to shoot (blind), meaning he was going to miss and miss badly - if you have fired any gun, EVER, once in your life, you would know that even when aiming carefully its not very easy to hit your target - shooting blind, it takes a small miracle to hit anything smaller than a barn. Instead of taking just one shot, dummy cop opens up with 3, 4 shots on the guy losing his pants, in a t-shirt, with no protection of any kind. The "perp" is killed. Way to go, Mr. Law enforcement. That said, yes, the man reached back (for his falling pants), which will make any cop nervous and twitchy on the trigger - but recall, the purpose is to handcuff these two, not shoot them and kill them.

Again, policeman or woman is not an easy job, and they must have good common sense and good, calm nerves and a high emotional IQ. The two perps were clearly not prepared to mass kill anyone. The perps were unprepared, poorly dressed, couldn't follow orders, came apart, emotionally, very quickly - this are just too poor sods acting stupid. A good cop will figure this out in about 20 seconds. The language a person uses, their dress, their actions - its not rocket science to figure out. Come on, ladies and gentlemen; yet again, we can do better than this.

JB

Monday, October 30, 2017

No. Men are not women. AND NEVER WILL BE.

I'm not saying the men couldn't hustle a bit more about the house with cleaning. They could. Myself included.

But if you want to keep a relationship alive - WHICH SHOULD BE YOUR KEY CONCERN HERE - you will learn where to pick your battles. And you will learn (if that's even possible) that men are not women, and cleanliness is at the bottom of most of our lists.

Make a list of what you want ladies. Clean men are not masculine, dominant alphas that kill things to eat and dominate at work. And that is what you want. So STFU.

No, I'm not a jerk. I'm sorry its this way. But IT. IS. THIS. WAY. Women have been complaining about messy men for 7 million years. YOU ARE NOT ALONE, but quit whining. A whiney woman is the #1 reason men avoid women ENTIRELY. Forget marriage. More and more men don't even SPEAK to women. That's how bad things have gotten.

Actually, THIS is how bad things have gotten:

According to Dr. Michele Ramsey, Associate Professor of Communication Arts and Sciences at Penn State Berks, emotional labor is often conflated with problem solving. “The gendered assumption is that ‘men are the problem solvers because women are too emotional,’" she explains. "But who is really solving the bulk of the world's problems at home and in the office?” As the household manager for my husband and three kids, I’m fairly certain I know the answer. I was gifted a necklace for Mother's Day while my husband stole away to deep clean the bathrooms, leaving me to care for our children as the rest of the house fell into total disarray.

In his mind, he was doing the thing I had most wanted—giving me sparkling bathrooms without having to do it myself. Which is why he was frustrated when I ungratefully passed by, not looking at his handiwork as I put away his shoes, shirt and socks that had been left on the floor. I stumbled over the box of gift wrap he had pulled off a high shelf two days earlier and left in the center of our closet. In order to put it back, I had to get a kitchen chair and drag it into our closet so I could reach the shelf where it belonged.
All you have to do is ask me to put it back,” he said, watching me struggle.
It was obvious that the box was in the way, that it needed to be put back. It would have been easy for him to just reach up and put it away, but instead he had stepped around it, willfully ignoring it for two days. It was up to me to tell him that he should put away something he got out in the first place.
“That’s the point,” I said, now in tears, “I don’t want to have to ask.

The crying, the snapping at him—it all required damage control. I had to tell him how much I appreciated the bathroom cleaning, but perhaps he could do it another time (like when our kids were in bed). Then I tried to gingerly explain the concept of emotional labor: that I was the manager of the household, and that being manager was a lot of thankless work. Delegating work to other people, i.e. telling him to do something he should instinctively know to do, is exhausting. I tried to tell him that I noticed the box at least 20 times over the past two days. He had noticed it only when I was heaving it onto the top shelf instead of asking for help. The whole explanation took a lot of restraint. 

My urge to get married just fell by 5,000%. Maybe more. This woman, er, snowflake, has a problem because her hubby gave her a necklace (um, you are owed nothing. ever. EVER. For any reason, holidays included. It is all a gift.), and if that were not enough COMMENCED WITH CLEANING THE HOUSE BATHROOMS - PLURAL - LOLOLOLOL. 

Ask a modern girl what man is in a big rush to buy her ANYTHING, lol, much less do so before cleaning the bathrooms!!!  Further, this kind gesture was A BURDEN TO HER, LOLOLOLOL. 

Why, you dare ask? Well, because this left her to "care for our children as the rest of the house fell into total disarray." So was he supposed to buy you a necklace, take care of the kids, and clearn the rest of the house SIMULTANEOUSLY? LOLOLOLOL. 

Complain about a man not doing enough and you'll wind up with what you so richly deserve: no man. nothing. 

Further, I love how the kids are suddenly not her responsibility AT ALL. Go to divorce court, lady. Trust me, suddenly they will be YOUR children, alone. As if he were not a part of it. LOL.

And men are skittish about marriage? REALLY? I can't imagine what is holding them back! HAHAHAHAHAH.

You don't need to ask a communications professor, girls. Just ask your grandmother. Men are messy. Deal with it. Also, we don't "deliberately ignore" things in the closet. WE DON'T CARE ABOUT THINGS IN THE CLOSET. THAT'S WHAT CLOSETS ARE FOR: DUMPING THINGS IN THERE IN NO PARTICULAR ORDER. Don't like that? DON'T MARRY A MAN. 

The real lesson Ms. snowflake here missed? THAT HE PUT IT BACK IN THE CLOSET, AT ALL. Oh, and YOU'RE WELCOME for the necklace, you thankless brat.

This is just yet ANOTHER example of the "women-are-the-baseline-and-men-are-the-deviation-from-that-baseline-and-must-be-fixed," garbage that is ruining relationships every where. 

Whine and bitch and moan ladies. YOU WON'T BE MARRIED A MONTH.


Monday, October 23, 2017

More Jerk Cops - Rapists this time.

https://reason.com/blog/2017/10/23/nypd-slut-shames-teen-who-says-she-was-r

What to even say here..... Hang the two cops from a lamp post. What a couple of assholes. Pardon me: FELONY assholes.

Women are out complaining and whining about being stared at as they walk down the street in barely-there, sheer, skin-tight clothing (why exactly does that surprise you, ladies?), and here we have an innocent girl being RAPED AT GUN POINT BY THE POLICE - where is CNN? Where is the modern media?

And after the cops are CAUGHT with their DNA on the victim, who they pulled over for a traffic stop, they admit they had sex with her (oral sex with one, more with the other), and then claim.... it was CONSENSUAL!?!?!? HOW STUPID ARE THESE FREAK "police?"

ARMED MEN, with the full authority of the state, take into their custody a 5'2" TEENAGE GIRL and then claim she WANTED to have sex with them? WHY WOULD SHE WANT TO SUDDENLY HAVE SEX WITH TWO STRANGE MEN?

JESUS. H. CHRIST ALIVE. Fire them both FOR STUPIDITY NOW. Never mind they raped a girl at gunpoint WHILE ON DUTY, ABUSING THEIR AUTHORITY in the worst possible way. They are on "modified duty" now!?!?!? WELL THE WOMEN OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD WILL SLEEP BETTER AT NIGHT THEN, EH CAPTAIN? JESUS! They're still on the street! Sexual predators, armed, and wearing badges, ARE STILL. ON. THE. STREET. Being PAID by the state. The state is now HARBORING sexual predators.

LET THAT SINK IN.

These armed men INTIMIDATED. A. GIRL. into sexual acts and then claimed..... it was her idea? Or that she didn't refuse, so therefore, its all fine?

WHERE ON EARTH DO THESE PEOPLE COME FROM? Anything with a heartbeat and two eyes is given a badge and a gun and put on the street.

Oh, p.s., the cops found prescription pills that belonged to the passenger in the car, but they were "loose and not in the bottle," (oh, no), so they detained..... the driver. Who did not own or possess the pills. at all. And the driver happened to be a petite girl whom they both had sexual acts with (gee, did they threaten her with a big drug sentence if she didn't)? And then they charge her with.... nothing. Took her into custody.... but did not charge her with a crime? Uh, so if they are telling the truth and she broke the law and then had sexual intercourse with them, doesn't that mean they accepted a BRIBE?

They're monsters. And assholes. FIRE THEM. NOW. At an absolute bare minimum this is EXTREMELY POOR JUDGEMENT, and from there escalates to a felony. Throw the book at them. What pricks.

Sunday, October 15, 2017

Katy Who? Piss Off.

http://www.katykatikate.com/2017/10/next-level-rage-stroke-harvey-fucking.html?m=1

With a capital 'P.'

Apparently, only women are allowed to be sickened by Harvey Weinstein, this random liberal harpy has picked up the microphone; let's all "gather" to hear her exalted wisdom:

GENTLEMEN. GATHER.

I hear you.
You are shocked.
You have daughters.
You wish to express your outrage and solidarity with women.
You wish to let us know that you would protect us from harm.
You think Harvey Weinstein is a monster.
You proclaim that WE must ALL do BETTER for our WOMEN.

None of this is "incorrect." These are all "right" answers. And I know you genuinely feel upset and angry and staggered at the scope of the crime.

But I'm going to bring you into the inner circle right now, guys:

I DON'T REALLY BELIEVE YOU. NONE OF US DO.

We can't afford to.

Spare me, honey. The men you know? They're all liberal. Trust me. A conservative man wouldn't get within 10k miles of a liberal harpy like you. And when I mean liberal, I mean MANGINA. Feminist lackey, wears whatever his wife tells him to, bows before female opinion and just repeats what you say.

Conservative men saw this story before it was even written - about 40 years ago. When Hollywood got just STUPID rich, and producers, studio execs, and slimey middle men like no-talent Wein-slime came into power dealing and selling smut. Smut - you know, movies showing a stud muffin male actor conquering the world (alpha male) and some actress playing a flirty girl that steals his attention and winds up with him in the end after a all-too-short chase (he gets around to conquering her) period? Yeah. Boy-girl fantasy crap that adults laugh at. That stud doesn't exist and if he does, he runs through two dozen women like that before being put out to pasture. Women watch those movies as much as men; oh, pardon me. LIBERAL women watch those movies as much as men. They were designed just for men, of course, because no traditional, grown woman in 1970 believed that crap, or wanted to be the woman used for quick sex, but the new generation of young girls came into being and their "suspicion" that giving their body to the alpha male would work all along, was confirmed by the sensationalistic crap Harvey and pals put out. Havey amassed a small fortune and being about as attractive as a rotting tuna carcass, he started extorting women for sexual favors and humiliating them.

Actual MEN, of which you know none, Ms. Katy, saw this coming a mile away. Traditionally the business world has been male-dominated. That's a good thing, not a bad thing. Its a back-stabbing world that often gets political. Any decent woman is disgusted by it and avoids it for the most part - or used to. Quality men put up with it because they must, but they can't stand watching a product division go down because an idiot is in charge of it but won't be removed because he was hand-selected by a bigger idiot. My boss is a sweet guy, but I've spent 6 months trying to get him to choose what HIS boss has been begging for and what OUGHT to be delivered out the door. And men are married by women who see a future CEO in their husband, so old men are loathe to replace each other with their mutual fear - younger, smarter, more talented men - THAT causes a LOT of trouble on the home front with wives planning to send 3 kids to private college.

Men are supposed to bring home tons of money, because that is their WIVES' demand, so they slit each other's throats trying to climb the corporate ladder. So how does a male hefer like Mr. Wien-slime climb the ladder? With backstabbing, rumor, lies, cheats, and extortion - all to gain leverage; he attained so much leverage he started openly attacking women for sex. Again, only a liberal playboy even dares such behavior, and Hollywood is full of liberal playboys - they get rich from the movies and then start sleeping around, and the women, also wanting to nab one of these playboys, claim that this behavior is ok; after all, if you swing and miss, you might connect with the next liberal playboy. So game on. Oh and the rules entail the men can never judge her based on how many times she's swung and missed (probably a lot). The liberal playboys smell the game, by the way, and with the absurd divorce laws in place, they do all that they can NOT to get married. And the ones that do are taught harshly when their wife up and decides they have "irreconcilable differences," and cashes out to the tune of $100 million. Yes, some of these men cheat, but most men are not in a rush to get $100 million dollars poorer. Give me a break.

But back to Ms. outrage. Oh, the men aren't outraged enough? Oh, they must be lying? Why?

Again, a description of modern, liberal men:

I know and like hundreds of nice guys, and I trust 3 men on this entire fucking Earth.

Gentlemen, no matter how nice you are, how many lady friends you have, how happily married, how many daughters you have sired, and how many chick flicks you've watched and then said, "Hey, that was actually pretty good," 99.9% of the women in your life are reserving about 10% of their opinion of you. We are waiting.

We are waiting for you to have too many drinks one night. We are waiting for you to compliment our new jeans in front of the boss at work. We're waiting for you to interrupt us and explain our experience back to us - "You weren't actually catcalled, he just really liked your shirt." We aren't waiting because it's fun, or we're crazy. But because it happens. all. the. fucking. time. We have to hang back a bit and wait for your inner dirtbag to show himself because experience has shown us that he always fucking does.
I see. All men are dirtbags and we're just "hiding" it 90% of the time. Right. The "hundreds" of nice guys she knows are not nice. They're pushovers or else trying to be polite to a TOTALLY BRAINWASHED liberal harpy without telling her her ideas are whacko, impossible, and resulting in tons of single mothers, pushover boys and domineering women.

She doesn't trust 3 men. She trusts zero. But if the "hundreds" she knows told her what they really thought of her and the hordes of brain-dead liberal women like her, trying to run the western world, she would trust them, because then they wouldn't be agreeing with her every faux outrage.

Let's have one of those:

"You weren't actually catcalled, he just really liked your shirt."

No, that's a pushover's line. What he really wanted to say, but didn't want to put up with your shrill feminazi screams was "Your shirt is WAY too tight and revealing. The guy can't even use his imagination to picture what's under it - I don't care how COMFORTABLE it is, its indecent, its immodest, its overtly sexual, and unless you are looking for sex WITHIN THE HOUR, you should change, you are BROADCASTING your figure for sex. WAKE. UP."

But of course, he can't say that cuz the legion of shrill liberal harpies descend upon him with "How DARE you! She, why.... she can wear whatever she wants!"

No. dipshit. She can't. Not without CONSEQUENCES. You're about to tell me I'm justifying her being raped - and that's just how brain dead you are. No, I mean, the consequences of being catcalled - she is STIMULATING horny, aggressive, testosterone-filled men. This is a TEASE to men who cannot have her and they will reveal their bitterness by trying to shame her to 1) cover up 2) go broadcast somewhere else 3) wake up and understand she's being overtly sexually aggressive in her dress 4) be receptive to their advances. Men are scared, fragile human beings with feelings JUST LIKE WOMEN, and they don't like being teased. Sleep with us, or move on, is what the men are saying. They are sick of being teased at work, at home, at church, in the parking lot, the grocery store, the movies, the beach, the theater, our kid's school, in our cars, at bars, and at the gas station.

Women walk around my office (with an air and attitude) wearing SKIN TIGHT, and no, I don't mean "fitting" sheer, black or flower-patterned yoga pants CLUNG to their bottoms - PAINTED ON. This is WILDLY inappropriate. Some of these women are 21, 22. They have tight, voluptuous butts. A woman's butt is a sexual object - don't lecture me, I did not make it so. Wrapping it in sheer tight anything ISN'T professional or appropriate for an office; Hell, its not appropriate ANYWHERE in public. So if you wear it, fine, BUT EXPECT SOME STARES AND SOME CAT CALLS. Also? Grow a brain. And some modesty while you're at it.

Again, she misses it:

Really? Really. REALLY? Pay a-fucking-ttention, CHAD. When you chew up fifteen minutes of my day expressing your total galloping dumbfounded astonishment that the guy that every woman in Hollywood knew was a predator turned out to be a fucking predator, that tells me three things: 1) You don't talk to very many women about what it's like to be a woman, and 2) You don't listen to me, ever, and 3) you don't believe women when they tell you that something feels creepy, off, or weird about Harvey.

Yes, madam, REALLY. We don't believe you. Why? WE ARE NOT ALLOWED to. Why? Because every time an actual MAN says you are wearing a slut-uniform and acting profane, we get the feminazi manifesto about how its perfectly fine to wear long underwear to the office, gym, and grocery store, and that pervy men come onto you. NORMAL men don't come onto you because we're sick of your false lectures and we are APPALLED at your in appropriate dress. You know who that leaves you exposed to? At the mercy of in some cases? THE PERVS. The Pervs like Wein-slime rise up and suddenly you are the girl who cried wolf. When a normal guy saying "nice shirt" is a dirt bag, that means your next faux outrage panic attack is also dismissed, and when it turns out to be genuine, the men ARE pissed and confused. But yeah, a SMALL part of them is not really stunned. A dirt bag rose up and found a way to strike back at the girls that shot him down in high school. Well he's a nasty dirt bag and he can swing from the gallows, but when conservative men are told to step aside and shut-up, this is the kind of liberal grab-ass trash you can expect to slip through the cracks. Afterwards the women (don't say "ladies"), go running back to the conservative men, like naive daughters run back to their fathers, to complain that dad was right all along and this man wasn't going to help you or marry you, but was just using  you for his own purposes.

No shit, Sherlock.

When did conservative men get shoved aside? Around 1955; that's when men last treated women with a lot of respect, and women didn't dress like sluts outside of the bedroom, ever. They even covered their heads in church as a sign of modesty - look that word up, Ms. Katy, it is surely foreign to you. Men respect modesty - that's just ONE of the reasons why they don't respect you. Oh, and when is the last time you called a man "sir?" Yeah. Read and learn.

Oh, and the animated .gifs of men "leering" at women? Replace the one of the man saying "nice tatoos." There's nothing wrong with saying nice tattoos to a woman. I've said it before and the girl replied "thanks very much" and smiled. 

Again, more faux crap stemming from being around liberal men:

Have you ever felt entitled to a woman's time or energy?
Have you ever talked over a woman coworker or excluded her from a project because it would be easier socially without her?
Have you ever been annoyed when a woman caused a problem with a complaint against a co-worker?
Have you ever interrupted a woman?
Have you ever felt angry at her when she was direct with you?
Have you ever called your ex crazy?

Have you ever looked the other way when someone was being an asshole to a woman?

Just because you aren't this particular brand of dirtbag doesn't make you Maya fucking Angelou, Chad. You have misogyny in you. Everyone does. Every man in America can do better at respecting women, and I include in that statement literally every man in America. Did I fucking stutter?

If you want to be a friend to the ladies, stop being shocked. I seriously cannot get over everyone's SHOCK. Every time you're STILL FUCKING SHOCKED, it insults me.
Let's help "Katy" out here:

Have you ever felt entitled to a woman's time or energy? Yes. If I'm in a relationship with her and breaking my back for her, I expect something like that in return; if it doesn't come, I leave. Women think men are running after 14 women at once these days it seems, and discount how much our time is worth; this typically blows up in their faces. Also, many men live alone and spend their lives alone BY CHOICE. This is pretty freaking amazing considering just 70 years ago we were begging for a woman's hand in marriage at 18 years old.
Have you ever talked over a woman coworker or excluded her from a project because it would be easier socially without her? Sometimes, yes. When a woman (or man) is hung up on respect and authority and not the work, this is a huge issue that derails the ACTUAL PROJECT. Some women are great at communication and doing good work and I am happy to include them.
Have you ever been annoyed when a woman caused a problem with a complaint against a co-worker? Holy shit, this is a great one. I know about 42 women who find SOMETHING to bitch about in other women at work, so YES, I've been annoyed. I get annoyed at whiney, annoying people with a chip on their shoulder. Most do.
Have you ever interrupted a woman? Yes, and men too. Equally. SO WHAT?
Have you ever felt angry at her when she was direct with you? Who? A coworker? I don't think I've met 3 direct women in my whole life. 2 of whom were only direct when they wanted something or were blaming me for something. Whenever it was their turn to take responsibility, they had a litany of excuses on hand and suddenly became quite indirect.
Have you ever called your ex crazy? I had an ex-gf in college who came to my apt, let herself in, slept in my bed when I wasn't there, made it, left and that's how I found it the next day; she then broke into my place a few months later at about 3 am and asked to sleep in a bed next to me while I slept because some guy she was after didn't take an interest in her and left her at a bar nearby, drunk. So, uh, YES, I've called CRAZY PEOPLE, CRAZY. What the f@ck does this question even mean? Should a man not call a crazy person crazy? Breaking and entering is A FUCKING CRIME, genius. And men don't listen to you? I am so surprised.


Every man in America can do better at respecting women, and I include in that statement literally every man in America. Did I fucking stutter?
Is this supposed to be a joke or something? Men don't respect women because they've rigged the educational system and divorce laws to favor them - HEAVILY. They are legally allowed to steal. If a man has a relationship with a woman at work that goes south, he can be fired, but never her. If he accidentally says something she takes the wrong way (asperger's people do this often), he'll be fired. Women are a mine field. If she gets pregnant by one man, but tells another its his child THERE IS NO PENALTY, but rather she may enjoy the income of both men in certain states; she is literally REWARDED for lying, cheating, and stealing. Women insist on dressing sexually aggressively, but disregard the consequences for doing so. They sleep around but demand respect (???) and blame men for not marrying them when marriage is an invitation to divorce and bankruptcy for most men. They demand respect ex post facto. False rape allegations can be used as a weapon, Title IX has made men second class citizens as has the Violence Against Women Act. Men are fed up. Many men don't even SPEAK to women - AT ALL. Anywhere! The few remaining men scoff at the Wein-slime. He's a liberal. Bending the law, bribing, cajoling, calling in favors, using people. Telling lies. No, Ms. Katy, or whatever your name is, actual MEN actually HATE that liberal Hollywood prick.

Its just that shrill feminazi harpies like you don't know any real men, and so long as you advocate for a double standard and demand respect for swindling, thievery, immodesty, cheating, and lies, you never will.






Wednesday, October 04, 2017

Police wrong, man dies.... again

 Again, JUST TOO MANY OF THESE. They're at the WRONG house. It is THEIR responsibility to make sure they have the right address. If necessary, STAKE OUT the house, to see who is entering and leaving to MAKE SURE you have the right people!

https://reason.com/blog/2017/08/09/police-go-to-wrong-address-fatally-shoot

Monday, September 11, 2017

*Shakes head with face in palm*

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-4835898/Woman-reveals-s-77-dates-TWO-years.html


A few things here:

  1. This girl really isn't drop dead gorgeous, but I'm glad she has a good self-esteem. Personally, I'd pass, and I don't demand women look like playboy models
  2. Nothing wrong with having preferences, but hers are a bit of a reach. Let's break them down, as they are pretty much like every other woman's: tall, handsome, and rich. Again, this woman is really nothing special, appearance-wise and she's about as tender as a scorpion. What is a man getting from her?
  3. She keeps a spreadsheet that rates men in categories she has defined. This is the action of a woman who feels that she is being herself graded as an object and not as a person. The spreadsheet is cold, impersonal, and shallow. Women are treated this way in the Western world and it makes them feel sad, alone, and depressed; as if they are nothing more than the numbers which represent their waist and bra cup size. The spreadsheet gives her some of this "power" back. Without it, she feels small and unlovable, so she'll never give it up.
  4. She breaks off every relationships VERY EARLY. After the first date, in fact. That way the men don't get a chance to give her HER grade on looks, etc.. She "retains" her grading power.
  5. This is not a happy person ready to give of herself. She's demanding of others, exacting, and cold. She's made up her mind to be alone as it makes her less vulnerable and feel powerful.
  6. This woman is approaching 30 and getting older seldom makes a woman more attractive. She's had attractive boyfriends in the past and there is no reason to think her potential mate will be more attractive or richer, or taller, or whatever, than her previous boyfriends; in fact, they'll probably be worse in every "category."
  7. She's so shallow and cold about people (men), no decent man would want to be with her for very long.
  8. She says she'd rather "die alone" than be with the wrong person, but she's proven EVERY MAN is the wrong person for her, so she'll die alone then. This is how powerful fear is. Respect it.
  9. This woman's biggest enemy is herself. She has become her fear and it is ruining her life. No one can help her but her.




Friday, August 25, 2017

Friday, August 04, 2017

Game. Set. Match.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-4752706/Seduction-expert-says-men-date-Russian-women.html


Your takeaways ladies?

Being hot is overrated, but drinking less, eating less (carbs and sugar), and taking care of your appearance is important.

Being profane, rude, disrespectful, arrogant, snide and DISRESPECTFUL, guess what?
THOSE THINGS MAKE YOU LOOK HIDEOUS, no matter how hot you are or are not.

Being feminine? Respectful? DIRECT? And have some SELF-RESPECT?!?!?!

THOSE ARE GOOD THINGS.

Read it all.