Wednesday, September 17, 2014

Man Shoots Intruder Coming Through Window at 5:30 a.m., Gets Death Penalty

Why? Because the intruder he shot was a cop attempting to, are you ready for this, SERVE A SEARCH WARRANT.

Let's summarize: there are good cops, great cops, below average cops and morons. File this under morons. The cop serving the warrant was an 18 year veteran. Someone please tell me how it makes practical sense to BREAK IN - yes, that's what they were doing, to deliver a search warrant?

The police did not knock on the door. Did not scream "POLICE, OPEN UP!" Nothing. Instead, in the early morning, when people are disoriented from sleep, they go in through a window? That's called breaking and entering. Its a crime. Its illegal. A search warrant does not give the police the right to break in. They must, BY LAW, give a copy of the search warrant to the resident notifying them of their rights as well as proving - via the warrant - that A MAGISTRATE has seen fit to issue a warrant giving the police the right to enter your home against your objection. This is always done calmly and deliberately because you are ENTERING SOMEONE'S RESIDENCE. GET IT? ITS NOT THE COP'S HOUSE. They can't just bust in the door and start screaming at people, THEY DON'T HAVE THAT RIGHT. The only time a no-knock "raid" is considered justified is when there is a house of KNOWN felons who are KNOWN to carry weapons and even then the cops are on thin legal ice.

Now, the police have the right to defend themselves, so they often serve search warrants armed, with multiple cops, and, IF CIRCUMSTANCES WARRANT IT, a S.W.A.T team; so again, if a house of 15 men known to carry arms is to be searched, SWAT would most likely come along to serve the warrant, its only prudent.

THE HOUSE IN THIS CASE HELD JUST ONE MAN. ONE. MAN. This did not require the police SWAT team - and their automatic rifles - at all. AT. ALL. They could've simply served the warrant DURING THE GODDAMN DAY! Hello? Are they morons? Why serve a warrant at 5:30 a.m.?!?!? I would be scared shitless if someone knocked on the door at that hour NEVERMIND came in through a bloody WINDOW! You go in someone's window, at night, Hell, even if you know them, be prepared to be assaulted. You will scare and startle someone and that can only instill them with fear, which leads to defense of their bodily person, something the U.S. CONSTITUTION PROMISES IS THEIR GOD-GIVEN RIGHT. PERIOD. THE END.

The cops BROKE IN to a SINGLE man's home, carrying guns, and they were shot at. GEE, NO KIDDING! WTF is so wrong with knocking on the door? And to top it off, THERE WERE NO DRUGS IN THE RESIDENCE! So they received a FALSE TIP that the man possessed drugs (not a really scary crime, if you ask me; unless he's got 50 kilos of cocaine or something, why would he be considered dangerous? Someone with a few grams of a banned substance is planning to use it themselves in all likelihood - what the Hell about that requires a SWAT team?), and then broke into the home and discovered no drugs were there. Uhhhhh, that equates to THE POLICE FUCKED UP, and since they broke into the home without serving the warrant FIRST, they have broken the law and should be sent to jail - YES, JAIL - no one, NO ONE, is above the law, NOT EVER. If the police get cut a little slack because of the difficulty of exercising caution, yet being exposed to attack, I'll understand, but this is something else entirely.

And what do we see? We see a court system that is MARRIED TO THE POLICE. The judges, prosecutors and police ARE ALL THE SAME THING. No prosecutor is charging the police with a crime, no judge is (yet) throwing out the charge against the man whose home was broken into! This case SHOULDN'T EVEN MAKE IT TO TRIAL. There is a clear justification of a man defending his person and home, AND THAT'S THAT! If the police don't want to get shot at, they should not BREAK AND ENTER A HOME without a warrant to BREAK AND ENTER (there is no such thing) - they have a SEARCH warrant, which they FAILED TO SERVE, so they are simply intruders after that. The resident of the home can't see or hear that THE POLICE ARE BREAKING IN THROUGH A WINDOW! And why would he think the police were breaking in, after all, that's illegal!!!!

That the police would even ATTEMPT to break-in to such a non-threatening home with one man in it, IS ITSELF WILDLY CONCERNING! There is NO CAUSE for the police to do that, especially in this case! This "bad guy" was one man home alone, asleep, and not in possession of any drugs!!!

Further, the REAL risk here is that people - law obeying citizens, stop cooperating with the police! Regular citizens could, justifiably, become AFRAID of the police and see them as assailants and NOT protectors! WHAT THEN!?!??! Then the police NEVER catch the bad guys because no one will testify as a witness or give a statement about a crime they have information about! So MORE bad guys go lose. Further, and a BIG ISSUE BEING MISSED BY ALL, is that if the police take any old tip from any "informant," without confirming it with their own research and reconnaissance, then THIS BECOMES THE SALEM WITCH TRIALS - like what is happening in Iraq. Have a business competitor you want to get rid of? Have a rival to the girl you want? JUST GIVE THE POLICE A TIP THEY POSSESS DRUGS! The police kick in the door to "serve a warrant" and a shootout takes place with the "accused perpetrator" (who is innocent) either shot, or accused of attempted murder/murder of a police officer!

This is not new. It is WELL known that members or family members of drug gangs tip off the police to hit rival gangs who possess narcotics or weapons, illegally. Its just a method to get rid of your competition.


Scary times.

Monday, September 15, 2014

How Bad (and False) is the "MAN IS BIG, EVIL MONSTER, WOMAN IS SMALL, HELPLESS CHILD" Narrative?

From the ultra-feminist The Guardian, a British rag that claims to be progressive and enlightened but usually just pushes the stereotypical crap about ALL men being monsters and perpetrators, comes this:

This article is just FULL of examples of the false modern-media narrative about domestic violence. It highlights one especially vulgar example, Kelly Brook, who struck not one, but two ex-boyfriends, then laughed about it in an interview (imagine a man doing that? He'd castrated as a "savage woman beater" on the front page news the very next day) and declared no biggie, she'll just keep moving on - yet another fine example of an emotionally damaged female pretending to act blaze and powerful about her relationships, when bouncing from alpha male to alpha male has clearly and irrevocably shaken her faith in herself as a woman able to retain a man as well as her ability to trust a man not to hurt her. Her pain translated to such rage, she struck two men - both of whom could've retaliated, but who instead ran away and failed to report the DOMESTIC VIOLENCE they suffered.

The only disappointment about the article is, of course, the comments section, which if full of "I am a big strong man so when old girlfriends hit me, it was ok, and not really abuse [sic]." Masterful job of missing the article's point, oh educated public. Violence is violence, regardless of gender. And when one partner hits another, bad things happen, including retaliation, sooner or later, and in some cases, justifiably so.

The bright spot in the comments come from the men who were beaten and scratched my female partners and called the police only to be ARRESTED THEMSELVES. You can't make this stuff up; throwing a big fat spotlight on what is a total farce of a DV policy. The DV policy in the western world is any-accused-of-DV-man-is-a-free-lunch for police to pad their arrest numbers, for lawyers to get a paying client, for more criminal cases to justify more judges, more state control of the family, more state employees, more tax dollars, more DV revenue, etc. etc. etc..

People who are part of this for-profit system will tell you from their own mouths they see injustice committed every. single. day. and are helpless to stop it or interfere with it for fear of being castigated a "misogynist, a woman-hater," [or conversely a man-lover? a modern-day "nigger-lover?!?!"]. Every society has its made-up villains. In the early 1900s the myth was the ravenous, violent negro who was going to rape the white women, and murder and plunder. Then came the managed ghettos in housing projects, the absurd drug laws making possession of mere grams of banned substances a 10 year prison sentence - a victimless crime with a mandatory minimum of 10 years?!?! These policies incarcerated 10% of the total African American male population - absolutely absurd figures. And today its the myth of the raping, violent, monstrous young alpha male, ignoring women's feelings, beating them and raping them at will with no consequence.

Ask anyone off the street what the raging epidemic of our times are, crime-wise, and they'll croon Domestic Violence - the men are abusing women. Ask ANY politician, esp. any Democrat, and they'll SCREAM DV, knowing that it resonates with their female voters and disillusioned, self-hating male voters, hoping it'll buy them a reelection, yet knowing damn well that no amount of laws will prevent dysfunctional men and women from engaging in physical conflict, something anyone with rational thought will understand, and something statistically proven by study after study.

But the modern media and its low ratings, the politicians and their ULTRA low ratings, the billion dollar National Organization for Women with NO LEGITIMATE battles left to fight, all have a message and an agenda and they will cram it down your throats no matter how little sense it makes.

We can only hope FACTS and REASON win out in the end. In the meantime, listen to all the lonely young women whine about how men avoid them like the plague....

Wednesday, September 10, 2014

Don't Rape? Thanks for Stopping Me! Ok, when do Don't Murder! Don't Steal! and Don't Commit Arson! come out?

Because all any (disturbed, possibly psychopathic, violent, drug-addled) person needs is a pamphlet to prevent them from raping someone!?!?!

Is this supposed to be funny? Because its logically comical. Rapists don't read pamphlets only days or moments before committing a rape.

I really have no idea what they will do, I'm not one, but from what I understand Rape is NOT about sex, its about POWER and people who are after power don't take advice from random posters begging them not to do something (anything).

Further this poster is wildly offensive. Don't put drugs in women's drinks? What? Is there a rash of that happening? I would submit there is not, but further I would submit that when you go to a loud noisy club full of strangers you ought not to be taking drinks from sketchy looking guys as a general rule; also as a general rule, you should not leave your drink unattended. Never, ever, ever go home with a man from a club. All any DECENT man wants when he buys you a drink is the chance to talk to you and ask for your phone number if he likes you. When the Hell did sex - THAT NIGHT - become involved? What a ridiculous escalation! What is this, the middle of WWII and people are all going to die tomorrow? Come now.

Further, statistics prove this is a joke. 1/3rd of all women on dating web-sites have sex with men they meet online on the very first date. Don't believe me? Look it up.

How sad is that?

Fellas, you don't have to spike anyone's drink. Just post an online profile showing you are a bad ass alpha male and take the girl out to dinner; now granted many of those online people are good matches and "hit it off" on the first date, but ladies, listen up - if you sleep with us on the first date, a little part of us, no matter how small, will lose respect for you and that will never come completely back.

And don't forget, sex means children. Don't give me your bullshit about birth control and family planning. Sex is mother nature's way of making children so EXPECT to get pregnant. Maybe not the first time, maybe not the second, but eventually, you will (and then you will act surprised).

But wow, I'm SO GLAD we're not making any posters that say "Gee, maybe all this sex with people who will not become your spouse is A BAD IDEA in general ESP. for women. Studies have shown when women have more than JUST ONE sex partner before marriage (not unusual) her long time odds of divorce go up MARKEDLY, in some studies as much as 50%.

So if we want to help women (like help them avoid DIVORCE), why not post posters that tell them not to sleep with any man who doesn't want to get married!?!?!?

And oh, sleeping with your future lifelong husband brings your rape risk down to what..... zero?

Let's make sure we don't say things like "DON'T GET DRUNK AND KNOCK ON AN OVER-SEXED ATHLETE'S DOOR AT 2 AM" cuz you know, if that guy let's you in and you start slobbering all over him and turn him on and he starts having intercourse with you IT IS ALL HIS FAULT.

Grow up, already. Give the girls a break. They're half-drunk, half-awake, doped up on anti-depressants, overeducated on feminazi propaganda, following doctrine that fails them, chasing alpha males that use them, and they're sick, tired, lonely, and depressed.

Wake up and get serious about the truth. The girls are trained to be targets because they're told SO MANY LIES. Men are programmed for sex ladies. Demand lots of dates and rings and lifetime promises. Demand it because you're worth it. Demand it and you'll get it. Drink jungle punch at a frat party looking like a slut and start grinding on testosterone-filled young men on the dance floor and your odds for rape will skyrocket. TAKE CONTROL OF YOUR PERSONAL LIFE and NEVER put yourself in a bad, HIGH-RISK situation. Throwing some guy in jail for rape is TOO LATE; you've already been raped - ignore this dumb-ass poster and take every precaution you can to AVOID any and all situations that could get you sexually assaulted.

Tuesday, September 09, 2014

What's Next, Kicked Out of Life?

Now the video has surfaced of Ray Rice actually hitting his then fiance, something everyone knew he did...

And he has been:

1) Deleted from a video game
2) Fired from his job
3) Suspended by the league, indefinitely (he cannot get a job in his chosen profession, professional football, within the NFL)

Now bear in mind, that he hit someone OFF the field and has not been even CHARGED with a crime (the victim refused to press charges, and in fact married him shortly thereafter).

Also bear in mind that a man hitting a woman - who has not hit him, threatened him with harm, with a weapon, or anything else - is completely reprehensible. Ole' Ray needs to learn to bear hug if he thinks his fiance/wife is moving toward him in a threatening manner (and really she rather was if you see the video).

But the punishment does not fit the crime. It is NOT the place of society, NOT the place of your employer (even if your employer is the NFL), NOT the place of the police, and NOT the place of public opinion to render judgement on you and throw you out of work in lieu of any criminal CONVICTION of any kind.

Ray Rice, at present, is NOT a criminal. He has not been charged or convicted of anything. I wish his [now] wife DID press charges and ensure he was sent to jail, but then she knew she would lose out on all Ray Ray's money. And she wants Ray's money. That's why she married him. I don't suppose she married him to get beat up. Do you? She and Ray obviously have a dysfunctional relationship and both need a counselor, but again, I don't run their lives and neither do you. With Ray being fired and banned from football, wifey lost twice. She was struck, humiliated in public, and now could be headed to being flat broke because her assailant, her husband, is banned from earning a living at his entire profession. This is the woman we are all "helping." Maybe we better stop.

Its not should be no surprise that this woman is now lashing out and defending her husband, claiming society is punishing him far more than is warranted.

Normally, that would be laughable. This time it is not. The punishments that have been brought to bear on Ray Rice have far exceeded the crime. Slap your wife? Has she slapped you? Screamed at her? Her at you? All of those things are considered Domestic Violence. So you have no problem with your neighbor filming any such incident and showing it to your employer who could then fire you from your job and blackball you from YOUR ENTIRE PROFESSION so that you could never work in your chosen field... Right?

Oh but I'm nuts and this isn't a slippery slope..... Really? People have been convinced to let the law (which is already absurd) be surmounted still and punish individuals who are criminally guilty of.... nothing. You are now letting public opinion govern (and possibly destroy) your life...

***UPDATE*** Looks like I'm not the only one with a brain examining this issue....